Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I Might Have to Run a Bad RPG System Next Week!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="orangefruitbat" data-source="post: 7839656" data-attributes="member: 3013"><p>Which version of WFRP would you be running (there are 4)? 1E (which TEW was originally written for) is a bit clunky but works. </p><p></p><p>2E takes 1E and systemizes it a bit. Works a bit better, but I think loses some of the original charm. You can run 1E adventures with 2E with virtually no changes. </p><p></p><p>3E is radically different, using different types and shapes of dice, cards and tokens. It actually works pretty well, but all the bits can get in the way. Would definitely require conversion.</p><p></p><p>4E is the newest version, and shares the percentile dice of 1E/2E, but with significant tweaks as to how success is mesured, damage is applied, etc. I really like it (it's my favourite edition of my favourite game), but I admit that the rules are not a model of clarity. On Reddit, there is a group dedicated to WFRP, and some FAQs that might help you understand the rules. There is a new, expanded version of the TEW being released by Cubicle7. </p><p></p><p>BRP/RQ/CoC is a pretty good suggestion if you abosulutely hate any of the WFRP rulesets.</p><p></p><p>If you were going to use 5E (which I I like, but not for TEW), this is what I would do. The WFRP setting is definitely less heroic than your average D&D setting. Combat is dangerous and brings long-lasting consequences. Characters can become powerful (at least relative to other people), but they aren't superheroes. The setting has a 15th-16th Century level of technology (albeit with anachronistic steam technology) - not medieval like most D&D:</p><p></p><p>*Cap PCs at level 5 or 6, and use super-slow advancement. (You might even break each level down into "sub-levels", where they get individual features or bonuses from their class just to keep things fresh).</p><p></p><p>*All spellcasting is risky - all wizards should be forced to rule on the wild magic sorcerer random magic table. (There are no sorcerer or warlock character classes - at least for PCs). There might be some good 3rd party supplements that flesh out the random magic effects</p><p></p><p>*Use sanity/madness rules from the DMG</p><p></p><p>*Use the gritty realism rules from the DMG</p><p></p><p>*Use firearms/explosive rules from the DMG</p><p></p><p>*I would use the lingering injury and massive damage rules from the DMG</p><p></p><p>*I would consider using the speed factor and hitting cover rules from the DMG</p><p></p><p>*Character's standing in the world is determined mostly by their background, not their class. Background is a minor feature in most 5E games, but for the TEW it will continue to be important. </p><p></p><p>*Use currency and equipment lists from WFRP rather than the 5E - this will do a lot for players to feel that they are not in a standard D&D setting. In fact, rather than start PCs with the standard 100 gp, I would get players to find the WFRP career that most closely matches their 5E class/Background combination, and have them start with the set of trappings listed for that career.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="orangefruitbat, post: 7839656, member: 3013"] Which version of WFRP would you be running (there are 4)? 1E (which TEW was originally written for) is a bit clunky but works. 2E takes 1E and systemizes it a bit. Works a bit better, but I think loses some of the original charm. You can run 1E adventures with 2E with virtually no changes. 3E is radically different, using different types and shapes of dice, cards and tokens. It actually works pretty well, but all the bits can get in the way. Would definitely require conversion. 4E is the newest version, and shares the percentile dice of 1E/2E, but with significant tweaks as to how success is mesured, damage is applied, etc. I really like it (it's my favourite edition of my favourite game), but I admit that the rules are not a model of clarity. On Reddit, there is a group dedicated to WFRP, and some FAQs that might help you understand the rules. There is a new, expanded version of the TEW being released by Cubicle7. BRP/RQ/CoC is a pretty good suggestion if you abosulutely hate any of the WFRP rulesets. If you were going to use 5E (which I I like, but not for TEW), this is what I would do. The WFRP setting is definitely less heroic than your average D&D setting. Combat is dangerous and brings long-lasting consequences. Characters can become powerful (at least relative to other people), but they aren't superheroes. The setting has a 15th-16th Century level of technology (albeit with anachronistic steam technology) - not medieval like most D&D: *Cap PCs at level 5 or 6, and use super-slow advancement. (You might even break each level down into "sub-levels", where they get individual features or bonuses from their class just to keep things fresh). *All spellcasting is risky - all wizards should be forced to rule on the wild magic sorcerer random magic table. (There are no sorcerer or warlock character classes - at least for PCs). There might be some good 3rd party supplements that flesh out the random magic effects *Use sanity/madness rules from the DMG *Use the gritty realism rules from the DMG *Use firearms/explosive rules from the DMG *I would use the lingering injury and massive damage rules from the DMG *I would consider using the speed factor and hitting cover rules from the DMG *Character's standing in the world is determined mostly by their background, not their class. Background is a minor feature in most 5E games, but for the TEW it will continue to be important. *Use currency and equipment lists from WFRP rather than the 5E - this will do a lot for players to feel that they are not in a standard D&D setting. In fact, rather than start PCs with the standard 100 gp, I would get players to find the WFRP career that most closely matches their 5E class/Background combination, and have them start with the set of trappings listed for that career. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
I Might Have to Run a Bad RPG System Next Week!
Top