Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I miss CG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="muffin_of_chaos" data-source="post: 4232187" data-attributes="member: 65007"><p>Of course it's semantic. But obviously it's necessary to absorb.</p><p>You believe that being Chaotic is to be devoted to the idea of Chaos. I believe that the way WotC is defining it is as Actually Chaotic.</p><p></p><p>No reason to drop an assumption that makes every bit of sense.</p><p></p><p>You are talking about something other than what I am talking about. You are talking about a Lawful *and* Evil person. Not a Lawfully Evil person.</p><p>I agree that Lawful/Evil can exist (Lawful Evil in the old system). Yes. Great. That's true. But the new system doesn't define it the same way.</p><p></p><p>All right. These philosophies have a definition of evil action that is Completely Irrelevant because it means that you cannot know when you are and are not doing good and evil actions. And if that is true, then no one would know how to act.</p><p></p><p>I don't. I'm perfectly willing to accept that your idea of Lawful/Good, Lawful/Evil, Chaotic/Good, all that old stuff exist. I put a '/' in there to more accurately label it, but it is exactly what 3.x alignments were. I am differentiating between the two editions. This second one focuses on Good and Evil, and scraps the Lawful and Chaotic "axis." I think it works better.</p><p></p><p>You aren't even arguing against me, you're just reinforcing the reasoning behind the previous system. Which is great. But it isn't the current system. You should probably be arguing that the new system sucks, rather than that the new system should be the old system without qualification.</p><p></p><p>That's fine. Hopefully one or two people do, and start to actually think about how the difference matters.</p><p></p><p>Um. Right. Unaligned people including everyone who isn't at heart devoted to Good or Evil. I'm sure they have no compunctions about their actions.</p><p></p><p>That's fine...it's a hard concept to grasp.</p><p></p><p>Common connotations define the usage and meaning of words.</p><p></p><p>Definition:</p><p>"Slavery is a social-economic system under which certain persons — known as slaves — are deprived of personal freedom and compelled to work.</p><p>Slaves are held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase, or birth, and are deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to receive compensation (such as wages) in return for their labor. As such, slavery is one form of unfree labor."</p><p></p><p>More importantly:</p><p>This still has nothing to do with the distinct difference between the old and new definitions of Lawful, Chaotic, Good, and Evil.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Rough day?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="muffin_of_chaos, post: 4232187, member: 65007"] Of course it's semantic. But obviously it's necessary to absorb. You believe that being Chaotic is to be devoted to the idea of Chaos. I believe that the way WotC is defining it is as Actually Chaotic. No reason to drop an assumption that makes every bit of sense. You are talking about something other than what I am talking about. You are talking about a Lawful *and* Evil person. Not a Lawfully Evil person. I agree that Lawful/Evil can exist (Lawful Evil in the old system). Yes. Great. That's true. But the new system doesn't define it the same way. All right. These philosophies have a definition of evil action that is Completely Irrelevant because it means that you cannot know when you are and are not doing good and evil actions. And if that is true, then no one would know how to act. I don't. I'm perfectly willing to accept that your idea of Lawful/Good, Lawful/Evil, Chaotic/Good, all that old stuff exist. I put a '/' in there to more accurately label it, but it is exactly what 3.x alignments were. I am differentiating between the two editions. This second one focuses on Good and Evil, and scraps the Lawful and Chaotic "axis." I think it works better. You aren't even arguing against me, you're just reinforcing the reasoning behind the previous system. Which is great. But it isn't the current system. You should probably be arguing that the new system sucks, rather than that the new system should be the old system without qualification. That's fine. Hopefully one or two people do, and start to actually think about how the difference matters. Um. Right. Unaligned people including everyone who isn't at heart devoted to Good or Evil. I'm sure they have no compunctions about their actions. That's fine...it's a hard concept to grasp. Common connotations define the usage and meaning of words. Definition: "Slavery is a social-economic system under which certain persons — known as slaves — are deprived of personal freedom and compelled to work. Slaves are held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase, or birth, and are deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to receive compensation (such as wages) in return for their labor. As such, slavery is one form of unfree labor." More importantly: This still has nothing to do with the distinct difference between the old and new definitions of Lawful, Chaotic, Good, and Evil. Rough day? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I miss CG
Top