Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I miss CG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="muffin_of_chaos" data-source="post: 4236950" data-attributes="member: 65007"><p>Moral codes aren't meant to change based on each action, however. That's why they're codes.</p><p>I don't believe that if people actually have a moral code, they can act contrarily to it. If they can, it wasn't really their moral code to begin with, just some set of ideals.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Can literal alignment be based on what others think your alignment is? There seems to be no reason to write it down, then.</p><p>In 4E alignment seems to specifically define whether or not you fundamentally align with good and evil, and has no bearing on how any individual other perceives you. They <em>can</em> still perceive your alignment and act accordingly, as they could before, but they can't change your fundamental beliefs for you.</p><p></p><p></p><p>When others are dictating your alignment (the DM, perhaps) in any given moment, you can't know what your own alignment actually is. The only thing writing it down can do is remind you of how you supposedly want others to perceive you. Which may be what you're aiming for, but in such case of representation I think the character's own personality is much more than his/her alignment, and perhaps in spite of it; thus, writing it down and having it stare you in the face is more likely to derail your expression of yourself in favor of conforming to two letters which really hold no depth of explanation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah...I consider alignment more like your birth date. Static.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd contend that you cannot be devoted to doing evil and following the law at the same time.</p><p>If you're more interested in upholding the law than anything else, and will do evil to accomplish that, I'd say you're Unaligned to the good/evil axis. If you believe that by upholding the law you will promote the greatest good, perhaps you are in fact Lawful Good.</p><p>If you want the law/chaos axis back, I guess I can't help you. I think that there are so many different kinds of Lawful and Chaotic, and being truly Lawful or Chaotic is so rare, that labeling yourself as either was and is meaningless, and is best served by allowing your actions to represent how you react to specific and different laws and codes.</p><p>I also don't believe that Law and Chaos can fight in a war devoid of morality...Good and Evil would always be defining the reasoning behind the war.</p><p>But I think that's been gone over.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="muffin_of_chaos, post: 4236950, member: 65007"] Moral codes aren't meant to change based on each action, however. That's why they're codes. I don't believe that if people actually have a moral code, they can act contrarily to it. If they can, it wasn't really their moral code to begin with, just some set of ideals. Can literal alignment be based on what others think your alignment is? There seems to be no reason to write it down, then. In 4E alignment seems to specifically define whether or not you fundamentally align with good and evil, and has no bearing on how any individual other perceives you. They [I]can[/I] still perceive your alignment and act accordingly, as they could before, but they can't change your fundamental beliefs for you. When others are dictating your alignment (the DM, perhaps) in any given moment, you can't know what your own alignment actually is. The only thing writing it down can do is remind you of how you supposedly want others to perceive you. Which may be what you're aiming for, but in such case of representation I think the character's own personality is much more than his/her alignment, and perhaps in spite of it; thus, writing it down and having it stare you in the face is more likely to derail your expression of yourself in favor of conforming to two letters which really hold no depth of explanation. Yeah...I consider alignment more like your birth date. Static. I'd contend that you cannot be devoted to doing evil and following the law at the same time. If you're more interested in upholding the law than anything else, and will do evil to accomplish that, I'd say you're Unaligned to the good/evil axis. If you believe that by upholding the law you will promote the greatest good, perhaps you are in fact Lawful Good. If you want the law/chaos axis back, I guess I can't help you. I think that there are so many different kinds of Lawful and Chaotic, and being truly Lawful or Chaotic is so rare, that labeling yourself as either was and is meaningless, and is best served by allowing your actions to represent how you react to specific and different laws and codes. I also don't believe that Law and Chaos can fight in a war devoid of morality...Good and Evil would always be defining the reasoning behind the war. But I think that's been gone over. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I miss CG
Top