Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ralif Redhammer" data-source="post: 7634029" data-attributes="member: 30438">Wouldn’t trade it for the world! When we’re both players, one of us tends to play the straight man and the other goes more eccentric. One of us might play the stodgy dwarf, the other a French halfling, or one an egomaniacal germophobe space wizard and the other an emotionless android.Back in the day, we were in a band together. When we were on the same page, everything came together great. But when we weren’t, then it got bad. We were open and raw about it, and it fell to the other bandmates to moderate that. Getting back to the subject at hand, when we had more time, it was easier to juggle multiple campaigns of different games. Now, D&amp;D is the easiest to recruit for. But it's also the easiest to keep going. Switching to something else, for me, always has to be weighed against that – is the time to get everyone to learn the rules and get on board with it worth it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ralif Redhammer, post: 7634029, member: 30438"] Wouldn’t trade it for the world! When we’re both players, one of us tends to play the straight man and the other goes more eccentric. One of us might play the stodgy dwarf, the other a French halfling, or one an egomaniacal germophobe space wizard and the other an emotionless android. Back in the day, we were in a band together. When we were on the same page, everything came together great. But when we weren’t, then it got bad. We were open and raw about it, and it fell to the other bandmates to moderate that. Getting back to the subject at hand, when we had more time, it was easier to juggle multiple campaigns of different games. Now, D&D is the easiest to recruit for. But it's also the easiest to keep going. Switching to something else, for me, always has to be weighed against that – is the time to get everyone to learn the rules and get on board with it worth it? [/QUOTE]

Verification