Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
I really don't like the new 4E PHB cover
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jedi_Solo" data-source="post: 4093649" data-attributes="member: 40245"><p>While I disagree that many of the pictures from the massive list of examples on the last page aren't examples of what was asked for...</p><p></p><p>It still does show that action shots with monsters are a popular cover choice. There has to be a reason why it is popular. This reason could be that all of the marketing executives for the examples in questions were asleep at the wheel and did what everyone else was doing. I, however, doubt this is the case. I'm guessing that the exects think that adventure and excitement (and... well... violence) sells. </p><p></p><p>(I'm a computer programmer and not a professional marketer. This is just how I interpret what I see before me.)</p><p></p><p>So the question becomes why is WotC going against the grain for the new PHB?</p><p></p><p>Change is fine. But the question I always ask myself when I see change is 'why'. (Yes I'm a cynic, why do you ask?) If the change is to stress something that is different is fine. Change simply for the sake of change tends to not work out so well.</p><p></p><p>So WotC wants to put a dragonborn or a tiefling on the cover to show the change in races. Good for them. They changed from the horned monster looking thing on the cover to a dinosaur looking thing on the cover because they were getting some slack for the demon looking guy on the cover. I fully endorse these changes.</p><p></p><p>I do have to wonder why, a game about exploring dangerous locations and having exciting battles does feature a cover about exploring dangerous locations and having exciting (usually violent) adventures. The two covers showing the pair of explorers covers the dangerous locations part (or at least "mysterious locations" which I am going to count in my written ramblings) but it doesn't say 'excitement' to me.</p><p></p><p>The PHB, the main book for the entire system (not just the players) I believe should cover the adventure and excitement portions of what the system supposedly intends to provide. The dragonborn cover has enough to say 'adventure' to me, but it doesn't portray excitement very well. I think the Green Dragon cover covers both.</p><p></p><p>So why go against the normal style of fantasy cover for the new edition, WotC?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jedi_Solo, post: 4093649, member: 40245"] While I disagree that many of the pictures from the massive list of examples on the last page aren't examples of what was asked for... It still does show that action shots with monsters are a popular cover choice. There has to be a reason why it is popular. This reason could be that all of the marketing executives for the examples in questions were asleep at the wheel and did what everyone else was doing. I, however, doubt this is the case. I'm guessing that the exects think that adventure and excitement (and... well... violence) sells. (I'm a computer programmer and not a professional marketer. This is just how I interpret what I see before me.) So the question becomes why is WotC going against the grain for the new PHB? Change is fine. But the question I always ask myself when I see change is 'why'. (Yes I'm a cynic, why do you ask?) If the change is to stress something that is different is fine. Change simply for the sake of change tends to not work out so well. So WotC wants to put a dragonborn or a tiefling on the cover to show the change in races. Good for them. They changed from the horned monster looking thing on the cover to a dinosaur looking thing on the cover because they were getting some slack for the demon looking guy on the cover. I fully endorse these changes. I do have to wonder why, a game about exploring dangerous locations and having exciting battles does feature a cover about exploring dangerous locations and having exciting (usually violent) adventures. The two covers showing the pair of explorers covers the dangerous locations part (or at least "mysterious locations" which I am going to count in my written ramblings) but it doesn't say 'excitement' to me. The PHB, the main book for the entire system (not just the players) I believe should cover the adventure and excitement portions of what the system supposedly intends to provide. The dragonborn cover has enough to say 'adventure' to me, but it doesn't portray excitement very well. I think the Green Dragon cover covers both. So why go against the normal style of fantasy cover for the new edition, WotC? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
I really don't like the new 4E PHB cover
Top