Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I roll Persuasion."
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 8731194" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>I fall into the school of thought which says that there really aren't cut and dried analogies to actual melee combat to exploit here. Clearly certain individuals can 'beat' an 'opponent' in some kind of social contest in some fashion, but the types of such contests are vast and extremely varied. Nor are they necessarily very amenable to being bounded in some easy way into an equivalent of an encounter or even a complete contest. There's no necessary point where your opponent must perforce yield, for example. Nor am I convinced there are exactly very good analogs to some kind of 'state' (like say hit points in D&D, though we could be discussing many different potential game designs). </p><p></p><p>Like, I think you could, kinda sorta create a system to adjudicate something like a 'debate', or something like that, but I would think that it mostly boils down to each side having natural advantages and disadvantages based on both their strengths and weaknesses, and how they interact with the other contestant(s), and also factors related to some larger ongoing 'state of affairs'. So, yeah, a GM could basically eyeball that down to some kind of "you have a 20% chance of scoring a 'killing blow' on your opponent in each hour of debate, and he has a 38% chance of doing so to you" or whatever. But I don't see much in the way of generic tactics. I mean, sure, individuals may utilize typical ploys that work for them, but its VERY VERY individual! I don't see a way to really codify any of that. </p><p></p><p>I mean, there are game designs, TB2 comes to mind and I think this generally applies to BW, which try to do that. IMHO it comes out as a very stilted and kind of awkward process. I like more loosely defined frameworks like the open-ended 'moves' style of play in PbtAs where you just 'do stuff', it may or may not be social, and the situation and outcomes are pretty much purely the fiction. 4e SCs can contain social conflict situations as well, either as a single element, or possibly the main thrust of the SC, and you can even make up special ground rules for them to account for certain factors that are unique to the situation (IE allowed skills, disallowed skills, etc.).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 8731194, member: 82106"] I fall into the school of thought which says that there really aren't cut and dried analogies to actual melee combat to exploit here. Clearly certain individuals can 'beat' an 'opponent' in some kind of social contest in some fashion, but the types of such contests are vast and extremely varied. Nor are they necessarily very amenable to being bounded in some easy way into an equivalent of an encounter or even a complete contest. There's no necessary point where your opponent must perforce yield, for example. Nor am I convinced there are exactly very good analogs to some kind of 'state' (like say hit points in D&D, though we could be discussing many different potential game designs). Like, I think you could, kinda sorta create a system to adjudicate something like a 'debate', or something like that, but I would think that it mostly boils down to each side having natural advantages and disadvantages based on both their strengths and weaknesses, and how they interact with the other contestant(s), and also factors related to some larger ongoing 'state of affairs'. So, yeah, a GM could basically eyeball that down to some kind of "you have a 20% chance of scoring a 'killing blow' on your opponent in each hour of debate, and he has a 38% chance of doing so to you" or whatever. But I don't see much in the way of generic tactics. I mean, sure, individuals may utilize typical ploys that work for them, but its VERY VERY individual! I don't see a way to really codify any of that. I mean, there are game designs, TB2 comes to mind and I think this generally applies to BW, which try to do that. IMHO it comes out as a very stilted and kind of awkward process. I like more loosely defined frameworks like the open-ended 'moves' style of play in PbtAs where you just 'do stuff', it may or may not be social, and the situation and outcomes are pretty much purely the fiction. 4e SCs can contain social conflict situations as well, either as a single element, or possibly the main thrust of the SC, and you can even make up special ground rules for them to account for certain factors that are unique to the situation (IE allowed skills, disallowed skills, etc.). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
"I roll Persuasion."
Top