Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bloodtide" data-source="post: 8907677" data-attributes="member: 6684958">I can't see any way this could ever work.&nbsp; No matter the person or group that is &quot;in charge&quot; of deciding what is wrong: it will always be that random.&nbsp; Except for the most vile stuff, you'd be hard pressed to even get two people to agree.I guess WotC is worried a publisher might use a wrong word and then everyone will put that on D&amp;D?But has that ever even happened?Maybe that would be a way to could work: Have WotC look at all the 3PP from the last 23 years and point out the things, that if published under OGL 2, that they would immediately dump.&nbsp; This would let us know what WotC is thinking.&nbsp; Or maybe add an &quot;Adult Audience Tag&quot; too: Content can be tagged as &quot;potentially offensive and not in anyway approved or endorsed by WotC.&nbsp; Then a publisher can use the word 'race' and won't have to worry about WotC.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bloodtide, post: 8907677, member: 6684958"] I can't see any way this could ever work. No matter the person or group that is "in charge" of deciding what is wrong: it will always be that random. Except for the most vile stuff, you'd be hard pressed to even get two people to agree. I guess WotC is worried a publisher might use a wrong word and then everyone will put that on D&D? But has that ever even happened? Maybe that would be a way to could work: Have WotC look at all the 3PP from the last 23 years and point out the things, that if published under OGL 2, that they would immediately dump. This would let us know what WotC is thinking. Or maybe add an "Adult Audience Tag" too: Content can be tagged as "potentially offensive and not in anyway approved or endorsed by WotC. Then a publisher can use the word 'race' and won't have to worry about WotC. [/QUOTE]

Verification