Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 8908755" data-attributes="member: 8461">I worry about how transparent any such organization would be, i.e. who's actually making the decisions.By that same token, if they were open about that, I'd expect that there'd be instances where something controversial was found not to be hateful/bigoted, and the people who reached that decision would be subject to a community outcry by those who disagreed with the decision. That could lead to hashtag campaigns against them personally, and the company they work for in general (e.g. "Hey, do you realize you're employing someone who just decided this filth was acceptable? Is that really what your company stands for?").The entire "decision panel" idea is only somewhat less bad than WotC reserving that power for themselves. But if we have to go that way, I think the best decision panel is the entire gaming community itself, and their "revocation" power should be not to buy the work in question.</blockquote>