Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think I prefer backgrounds in 2014
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 9544323" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Tying ASIs to Species is completely pointless, because it doesn't actually accomplish what people think it does. It merely gives some people the <em>impression</em> of what it is they think they want.</p><p></p><p>A +2 to an ability score does not make any creature appreciably more of that thing percentage-wise because of one simple thing-- that stat gets added to a <strong>d20 roll</strong>. Every test of a person's Dexterity (for example) is not just the ability score modifier... it also include upwards of <strong>20</strong> <strong>additional points</strong> of d20 roll modifier on top of it.</p><p></p><p>A person with a 14 Dexterity (+2 mod) has an <em>effective</em> Dexterity for all uses of that ability between <strong>3-22</strong>. <em>That's</em> a character's <em>actual</em> Dexterity to do things-- 3-22. And a person with a 12 Dexterity (+1 mod) has an effective Dexterity for all uses of that ability of <strong>2-21</strong>. And when we compare those two... we notice all the massive amount of different ways where the "less dexterous" character will <em>easily</em> defeat the supposedly "more dexterous" character in all manner of Dexterity checks. And that will happen all the time.</p><p></p><p>Which means that the supposed "necessity" of giving elves a +2 ASI to Dexterity (for example) in order to represent an elf's great grace and agility... only provides a <strong>5%</strong> boost. That's it. An elf is 5% more graceful and agile than a human (or any other Species). On any check, it's virtually a coin flip as to who's more agile, the elf or someone else. And people think that's actually <em>meaningful</em>? Nope. Not even close. If people are imagining that all elves are lithe Legolas-like creatures-- doing things like flipping upwards onto galloping horses and surfing down staircases... things that no other creatures in the world could possibly do... according to D&D math <strong>the dwarf </strong>Gimli has merely just a <em>5% less chance</em> of doing the <em>exact same thing</em>. ASIs and D&D math do not produce the narrative our imaginations <em>think</em> all these Species are meant to have.</p><p></p><p>One would say that the goliath <em>needs</em> to have a +2 to their Strength score in the Species write-up in order to differentiate it from a tiny halfling? Well... even <em>with</em> that, there's still a pretty easy chance during point-buy character creation that you're going to get a starting halfling in a particular campaign with a +3 STR mod with all their STR-checks rolling between 4-23... while your supposedly "massive" goliath having a +0 STR mod and rolling all their STR-checks between 1-20. Which means that +2 ASI one supposedly needed to have in the Species write-up to really show off the size disparity between goliaths and those tiny halflings has not done jack. All those times where the halfling is rolling 15s, 16s, 18s etc. and the goliath rolls 1s, 2s and 3s... getting absolutely blown out of the water on Strength checks. That ASI bonus due to Species did absolutely nothing to match the math to our narrative expectations and imaginations.</p><p></p><p>At the end of the day... in order for this game to work <em>as a game</em> it will never create the math situation required to match our expectations in terms of narrative. It can't. Because otherwise the game falls apart. So no one actually <em>needs</em> Species to include ASIs because they just don't accomplish what they think they do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 9544323, member: 7006"] Tying ASIs to Species is completely pointless, because it doesn't actually accomplish what people think it does. It merely gives some people the [I]impression[/I] of what it is they think they want. A +2 to an ability score does not make any creature appreciably more of that thing percentage-wise because of one simple thing-- that stat gets added to a [B]d20 roll[/B]. Every test of a person's Dexterity (for example) is not just the ability score modifier... it also include upwards of [B]20[/B] [B]additional points[/B] of d20 roll modifier on top of it. A person with a 14 Dexterity (+2 mod) has an [I]effective[/I] Dexterity for all uses of that ability between [B]3-22[/B]. [I]That's[/I] a character's [I]actual[/I] Dexterity to do things-- 3-22. And a person with a 12 Dexterity (+1 mod) has an effective Dexterity for all uses of that ability of [B]2-21[/B]. And when we compare those two... we notice all the massive amount of different ways where the "less dexterous" character will [I]easily[/I] defeat the supposedly "more dexterous" character in all manner of Dexterity checks. And that will happen all the time. Which means that the supposed "necessity" of giving elves a +2 ASI to Dexterity (for example) in order to represent an elf's great grace and agility... only provides a [B]5%[/B] boost. That's it. An elf is 5% more graceful and agile than a human (or any other Species). On any check, it's virtually a coin flip as to who's more agile, the elf or someone else. And people think that's actually [I]meaningful[/I]? Nope. Not even close. If people are imagining that all elves are lithe Legolas-like creatures-- doing things like flipping upwards onto galloping horses and surfing down staircases... things that no other creatures in the world could possibly do... according to D&D math [B]the dwarf [/B]Gimli has merely just a [I]5% less chance[/I] of doing the [I]exact same thing[/I]. ASIs and D&D math do not produce the narrative our imaginations [I]think[/I] all these Species are meant to have. One would say that the goliath [I]needs[/I] to have a +2 to their Strength score in the Species write-up in order to differentiate it from a tiny halfling? Well... even [I]with[/I] that, there's still a pretty easy chance during point-buy character creation that you're going to get a starting halfling in a particular campaign with a +3 STR mod with all their STR-checks rolling between 4-23... while your supposedly "massive" goliath having a +0 STR mod and rolling all their STR-checks between 1-20. Which means that +2 ASI one supposedly needed to have in the Species write-up to really show off the size disparity between goliaths and those tiny halflings has not done jack. All those times where the halfling is rolling 15s, 16s, 18s etc. and the goliath rolls 1s, 2s and 3s... getting absolutely blown out of the water on Strength checks. That ASI bonus due to Species did absolutely nothing to match the math to our narrative expectations and imaginations. At the end of the day... in order for this game to work [I]as a game[/I] it will never create the math situation required to match our expectations in terms of narrative. It can't. Because otherwise the game falls apart. So no one actually [I]needs[/I] Species to include ASIs because they just don't accomplish what they think they do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think I prefer backgrounds in 2014
Top