Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Azurewraith" data-source="post: 6727564" data-attributes="member: 6798581">I cant speak for everyone but i think the Hunter is fine BMs need a pet that can act with them. I want spells gone forever and ever never to be seen again! but some people like it so subclass it.The main reason i want ranger changed is this damn wilderness paladin crap a a wilderness paladin is a druid straight up through and through. Im pretty sure im repeating myself but meh everyone likes the sound of there own voi.... urm key strokes. The ranger is also not a guardian of nature they are a guardian  of civilization and man and couldn't care less about the trees.EDIT: Should maybe add what i want to see in.To me a ranger should be tough rough n ready living on the borders of civilization shutting down the savage races and animals if they begin to threaten civilization. Tracking and self sufficiency should be a key concept of the class, they should be the last man to fall after a long day they need to be swift to keep up with their quarry and to evade a Superior force. Nature should be their tool not their god! they should use it to heal themselves and others to craft traps to hide in to burn to the ground as a nukeI would Make hunters mark a feature.</blockquote>