Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the era of 4th edition Dungeons and Dragons had it right. (not talking about the rules).
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PMárk" data-source="post: 6924064" data-attributes="member: 6804619"><p>I'd have zero problems if they'd officially outsource their settings for 3rd parties like they did with 3e RL. But I said that a couple times too. Don't want to do RL? License it to Onyx Path! Spelljammer is too niche? Let's see if Kobold Press would want to pick it up! You could find reasons to not do basically anything in any other way they currently doing but it doesn't make their method the one true way. And <em>again </em>that something is making more money doesn't mean it is a better, or a more interesting rpg product. sorry, I'm not an employee of them, if they don't make books that I'm interested in, then i don't care how much people plays their current storyline. </p><p></p><p>Aside from that you likely just strengthened the notion that I won't get anything that interests me from WotC, because it's "too niche". It's exactly the problem with big companies. After a point they won't do anything that is "niche".</p><p></p><p>I don't say they won't do material, or use the DMsG in more active ways, or do outsourcing in the future. I hope they will, but right now they just not. </p><p></p><p>Also, I'm still not saying their adventures are bad, regardless of how i like CoS's take on RL. It's just not enough as setting material and aside from PotA neither of them has any significant thematic player options. OotA is not enough as an Underdark supplement, SKT is not enough as a North Faerun book, CoS is definitely not enough as a RL book. Also, I don't want to pick together a setting from 10 different 250+ pages adventure book. Even the APs with setting material+supplements model is could be done much better, Paizo proved that. </p><p></p><p>I <em>know </em>someone will bring up the old material, but we're just running in circles at this point. The old material is not compatible, not updated for the system and not advanced in lore. I think it's their job to update their settings and the settings thematic classes/prcs, monsters, rules, etc, not mine. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As far as I'm aware the adventures not related to the current storyline are on the DMsG.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PMárk, post: 6924064, member: 6804619"] I'd have zero problems if they'd officially outsource their settings for 3rd parties like they did with 3e RL. But I said that a couple times too. Don't want to do RL? License it to Onyx Path! Spelljammer is too niche? Let's see if Kobold Press would want to pick it up! You could find reasons to not do basically anything in any other way they currently doing but it doesn't make their method the one true way. And [I]again [/I]that something is making more money doesn't mean it is a better, or a more interesting rpg product. sorry, I'm not an employee of them, if they don't make books that I'm interested in, then i don't care how much people plays their current storyline. Aside from that you likely just strengthened the notion that I won't get anything that interests me from WotC, because it's "too niche". It's exactly the problem with big companies. After a point they won't do anything that is "niche". I don't say they won't do material, or use the DMsG in more active ways, or do outsourcing in the future. I hope they will, but right now they just not. Also, I'm still not saying their adventures are bad, regardless of how i like CoS's take on RL. It's just not enough as setting material and aside from PotA neither of them has any significant thematic player options. OotA is not enough as an Underdark supplement, SKT is not enough as a North Faerun book, CoS is definitely not enough as a RL book. Also, I don't want to pick together a setting from 10 different 250+ pages adventure book. Even the APs with setting material+supplements model is could be done much better, Paizo proved that. I [I]know [/I]someone will bring up the old material, but we're just running in circles at this point. The old material is not compatible, not updated for the system and not advanced in lore. I think it's their job to update their settings and the settings thematic classes/prcs, monsters, rules, etc, not mine. As far as I'm aware the adventures not related to the current storyline are on the DMsG. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the era of 4th edition Dungeons and Dragons had it right. (not talking about the rules).
Top