Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the era of 4th edition Dungeons and Dragons had it right. (not talking about the rules).
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 6925657" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I think it's a valid <em>wish</em>, but I think you're too generous (!) when you allow that it's a valid <em>complaint</em>. I don't think it is. WotC is not under a duty to publish more or different stuff, anymore than any of their customers is under a duty to buy more or different stuff.</p><p></p><p>OK - so you go somewhere else. I mean, one of my favourite take away food places sells souvlakis. And the only vegetarian option is falafel. When I want something other than falafel, I don't scream my rage at the heavens. I go to a different shop.</p><p></p><p>But what do you think they're doing - deliberately refusing to write these supplements just to spite you?</p><p></p><p>If they've deemed that writing those isn't an appropriate way of spending their organisation's finite resources, well, that's their prerogative. They want to spend all their resources making stuff that will sell better.</p><p></p><p>This seems like complaining that some large movie studio won't make the quirky black comedy, or character drama, or whatever that I want to see. No, they won't - but that's why I go to movies other than those produced by large studios.</p><p></p><p>It has nothing to do with <em>rationalisation</em> - it's about the commercial realities of certain publishers/producers, and about we, as <em>purchasers</em>, being willing to buy material from other sources if what the large firm is offering doesn't suit us. Complaining about their publication/production strategy - which is almost certainly better-informed than your complaints - just doesn't seem very worthwhile.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If what you want to do is run a D&D game, then I don't see why "fanfic" isn't enough.</p><p></p><p>But in any event, there is a lot of stuff already published, some of which I'm guessing you own, some of which is available at DTRPG. And conversion to 5e is extremely straightforward.</p><p></p><p>And the absence of new "metaplot" I think is a good thing for the strength of the RPG hobby.</p><p></p><p></p><p>And so, if you're not happy with the "megacorp" RPGs, buy from those other companies! There's a heap of stuff out there - OSR, "indie" games like Burning Wheel, etc.</p><p></p><p>It's not like it's hard to find good RPG material at the moment.</p><p></p><p>As far as "flopping" goes - if/when sales drop, I don't think WotC is going to be thinking "If only we'd published that 32-page module that posters on ENworld were calling for, our balance sheet would be completely different now!" If having sold 100s of thousands of copies of the PHB doesn't establish a solid market for future sales, I don't think publishing an extra short module or two would have made any difference.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 6925657, member: 42582"] I think it's a valid [I]wish[/I], but I think you're too generous (!) when you allow that it's a valid [I]complaint[/I]. I don't think it is. WotC is not under a duty to publish more or different stuff, anymore than any of their customers is under a duty to buy more or different stuff. OK - so you go somewhere else. I mean, one of my favourite take away food places sells souvlakis. And the only vegetarian option is falafel. When I want something other than falafel, I don't scream my rage at the heavens. I go to a different shop. But what do you think they're doing - deliberately refusing to write these supplements just to spite you? If they've deemed that writing those isn't an appropriate way of spending their organisation's finite resources, well, that's their prerogative. They want to spend all their resources making stuff that will sell better. This seems like complaining that some large movie studio won't make the quirky black comedy, or character drama, or whatever that I want to see. No, they won't - but that's why I go to movies other than those produced by large studios. It has nothing to do with [I]rationalisation[/I] - it's about the commercial realities of certain publishers/producers, and about we, as [I]purchasers[/I], being willing to buy material from other sources if what the large firm is offering doesn't suit us. Complaining about their publication/production strategy - which is almost certainly better-informed than your complaints - just doesn't seem very worthwhile. If what you want to do is run a D&D game, then I don't see why "fanfic" isn't enough. But in any event, there is a lot of stuff already published, some of which I'm guessing you own, some of which is available at DTRPG. And conversion to 5e is extremely straightforward. And the absence of new "metaplot" I think is a good thing for the strength of the RPG hobby. And so, if you're not happy with the "megacorp" RPGs, buy from those other companies! There's a heap of stuff out there - OSR, "indie" games like Burning Wheel, etc. It's not like it's hard to find good RPG material at the moment. As far as "flopping" goes - if/when sales drop, I don't think WotC is going to be thinking "If only we'd published that 32-page module that posters on ENworld were calling for, our balance sheet would be completely different now!" If having sold 100s of thousands of copies of the PHB doesn't establish a solid market for future sales, I don't think publishing an extra short module or two would have made any difference. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I think the era of 4th edition Dungeons and Dragons had it right. (not talking about the rules).
Top