Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 5299541" data-attributes="member: 5038">I do think breadth is good in settings is a bad thing. And, I think the idea that it is not was based on Slavisek's claim about "multiple buckets" trying to catch the same amount of rain.  Slavisek based that on his claim that people buy one setting and stick to it and then divide themselves up by setting rather than D&D players.  The gamers I know tend to like two or three different settings.Still, even if tpeple by one setting and stick to it,  had TSR controlled their print runs better, I don't see why that should be a problem?  You have a smaller initial print runs and base supplements and print runs on the sales numbers for each setting while putting out some general material as well.   And, if multiple settings is so bad, why are we seeing them under 4e now? Slavisek is still the guy in charge.  What makes multiple settings a better idea now than before?</blockquote>