Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 8487401" data-attributes="member: 59082">Good stuff. I think this is basically what they're doing through their settings, with each expanding the umbrella, or fleshing it out.Now they might find that certain things are more popular and they could put extra focus on those, but everything shifts so quickly, so even if they produce, say, more books in the broad style of Strixhaven for a few years, there's no telling how long it lasts. What I find strange is when it seems some either want D&amp;D to move away from certain things or avoid expanding into other things. Both extremes tend to exist as a sub-current in some of these discussions. Meaning, why not both/and? Why must it go in a certain direction and eschew others? I mean, within reason of course. But I imagine combat-heavy and adventure-focused products will always be part of D&amp;D, while at the same time they try out other things and expand what D&amp;D can be.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 8487401, member: 59082"] Good stuff. I think this is basically what they're doing through their settings, with each expanding the umbrella, or fleshing it out. Now they might find that certain things are more popular and they could put extra focus on those, but everything shifts so quickly, so even if they produce, say, more books in the broad style of Strixhaven for a few years, there's no telling how long it lasts. What I find strange is when it seems some either want D&D to move away from certain things or avoid expanding into other things. Both extremes tend to exist as a sub-current in some of these discussions. Meaning, why not both/and? Why must it go in a certain direction and eschew others? I mean, within reason of course. But I imagine combat-heavy and adventure-focused products will always be part of D&D, while at the same time they try out other things and expand what D&D can be. [/QUOTE]

Verification