Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6361549" data-attributes="member: 177">Aaand... we now have very clear edition warring!&nbsp; Excellent!While there's &quot;a good game&quot; stuck in there that the poster might try to hide behind, we also see the classic negative descriptive phrases (&quot;New Coke&quot; and &quot;runt of the litter&quot;), and the ever popular claiming it isn't really D&amp;D with the &quot;superficially..&quot; line.&nbsp; All combined with a complete lack of actual critical content - there's nothing in this post to *discuss*, just a bunch of negativity.&nbsp; Maybe you thought all the moderators were away at GenCon, and not watching?&nbsp; Mr. Dan here is earning himself a few days off.&nbsp; Let's hope everyone from here on out notes this, and maybe the thread can go smoothly from this point on...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6361549, member: 177"] [color=darkorange] Aaand... we now have very clear edition warring! Excellent! While there's "a good game" stuck in there that the poster might try to hide behind, we also see the classic negative descriptive phrases ("New Coke" and "runt of the litter"), and the ever popular claiming it isn't really D&D with the "superficially.." line. All combined with a complete lack of actual critical content - there's nothing in this post to *discuss*, just a bunch of negativity. Maybe you thought all the moderators were away at GenCon, and not watching? Mr. Dan here is earning himself a few days off. Let's hope everyone from here on out notes this, and maybe the thread can go smoothly from this point on...[/color] [/QUOTE]

Verification