Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[i]This[/i] is my problem with alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 1914594" data-attributes="member: 7240"><p>What I said is "alignment functions to prohibit conduct." (See above) Your argument is that as long as alignment has no function, it doesn't prohibit conduct. I suppose that's true but not really relevant because we are looking at the operational functioning of a thing.</p><p></p><p>It's like this. While it is true that "Joe is on the fifth floor" does not proscribe Joe's actions with respect to going to the third floor but when paired with "and anyone on the third floor</p><p>- loses all paladin spells and abilities (including the service of the paladin's mount (PHB 44)</p><p>- cannot gain new levels as a monk (PHB 42)</p><p>- loses the ability to rage (PHB 26)</p><p>- cannot progress in levels as a bard (PHB 30)</p><p>- loses all spells and druid abilities (PHB 37)</p><p>- can no longer use the intelligent magic item they have (DMG 269)</p><p>- cannot gain any more levels in the prestige class Assassin (DMG 180)</p><p>- cannot gain any more levels in the prestige class Blackguard (DMG 181)</p><p>- gains one negative level every time they attempt to use their weapon (DMG 223-226)</p><p>- becomes you vulnerable to detection by this spell (PHB 218-219)</p><p>- takes additional damage from this spell (PHB 205, 210, 218, 220-223, 241-242, 249-250, 266, 278, 297, 303)</p><p>- is immune to damage from this spell (PHB 205, 210, 218, 220-223, 241-242, 249-250, 266, 278, 297, 303)</p><p>- cannot cast this spell</p><p>it obviously does. Keeping your alignment is often an important thing to do. Failing to keep it has consequences. Consequences are what function to proscribe actions. </p><p></p><p>Your argument goes as follows: as long as alignment change has no in-game effects, it is not proscriptive. But it does have in-game effects. Dozens of them. </p><p></p><p>Furthermore, that's true of everything. Having a strength of less than 13 acts to prohibit you from taking the Power Attack feat. Thus, having a low Strength proscribes your from taking the Power Attack feat. I suppose you could argue that the feat and not the strength score functions to proscribe this but operationally, this statement is irrelevant and meaningless because the rules are an integrated whole.</p><p></p><p>Yes. I will happily grant that if you systematically remove every single in-game operational feature of alignment, the system ceases to be proscriptive. But that's only because it has ceased to have any effects. </p><p></p><p>Your argument is essentially: alignment only has in-game effects when it has in-game effects. Fair enough. I accept this. But what I'm interested in doing is discussing how alignment operates, how it <em>functions</em>. </p><p></p><p>You have clerics in your game who need to maintain a particular alignment in order to keep their domains. Their alignment functions to proscribe some of their actions because of the threat of losing these domains (and possibly, depending on how your play, all of their spells).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fusangite, post: 1914594, member: 7240"] What I said is "alignment functions to prohibit conduct." (See above) Your argument is that as long as alignment has no function, it doesn't prohibit conduct. I suppose that's true but not really relevant because we are looking at the operational functioning of a thing. It's like this. While it is true that "Joe is on the fifth floor" does not proscribe Joe's actions with respect to going to the third floor but when paired with "and anyone on the third floor - loses all paladin spells and abilities (including the service of the paladin's mount (PHB 44) - cannot gain new levels as a monk (PHB 42) - loses the ability to rage (PHB 26) - cannot progress in levels as a bard (PHB 30) - loses all spells and druid abilities (PHB 37) - can no longer use the intelligent magic item they have (DMG 269) - cannot gain any more levels in the prestige class Assassin (DMG 180) - cannot gain any more levels in the prestige class Blackguard (DMG 181) - gains one negative level every time they attempt to use their weapon (DMG 223-226) - becomes you vulnerable to detection by this spell (PHB 218-219) - takes additional damage from this spell (PHB 205, 210, 218, 220-223, 241-242, 249-250, 266, 278, 297, 303) - is immune to damage from this spell (PHB 205, 210, 218, 220-223, 241-242, 249-250, 266, 278, 297, 303) - cannot cast this spell it obviously does. Keeping your alignment is often an important thing to do. Failing to keep it has consequences. Consequences are what function to proscribe actions. Your argument goes as follows: as long as alignment change has no in-game effects, it is not proscriptive. But it does have in-game effects. Dozens of them. Furthermore, that's true of everything. Having a strength of less than 13 acts to prohibit you from taking the Power Attack feat. Thus, having a low Strength proscribes your from taking the Power Attack feat. I suppose you could argue that the feat and not the strength score functions to proscribe this but operationally, this statement is irrelevant and meaningless because the rules are an integrated whole. Yes. I will happily grant that if you systematically remove every single in-game operational feature of alignment, the system ceases to be proscriptive. But that's only because it has ceased to have any effects. Your argument is essentially: alignment only has in-game effects when it has in-game effects. Fair enough. I accept this. But what I'm interested in doing is discussing how alignment operates, how it [i]functions[/i]. You have clerics in your game who need to maintain a particular alignment in order to keep their domains. Their alignment functions to proscribe some of their actions because of the threat of losing these domains (and possibly, depending on how your play, all of their spells). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[i]This[/i] is my problem with alignment
Top