Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I want a return to long duration spells in D&D Next.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WizarDru" data-source="post: 5917744" data-attributes="member: 151"><p>I would like the return of long-duration spells.</p><p></p><p>I fully recognize the issue of confusing durations, burdensome bookkeeping and meta-game issues that some of these things can generate. Having played a 3/3.5E game from 1st to 30th level, I DIG. But I find the spell durations and magical effects of 4E go too far in the other direction. They render spells weak to make them regular effects or so combat focused that much of the utility of spells (and, dare I say it, their <em>magic</em>) is diminished or totally removed.</p><p></p><p>In large part, what I'm hearing as criticisms of long-duration spells is really people complaining about long duration <strong>BUFFS</strong>. Lord knows that 4E's tons of stacking and variable effects and statuses do absolutely nothing in my mind to relieve that burden. When I look at a target on the field who is bloodied, slowed, flanked, currently cannot take opportunity attacks, is cursed, has a mark, takes -2 to attacks until Player X's next turn, is taking 2 points of ongoing fire damage, has one power that <em>may</em> recharge on his turn and is poisoned? I'm not feeling like 4E has actually simplified my game as much as I'd hoped.</p><p></p><p>The issue of calculating and recalculating bonuses and attacks is in all versions. 4E's math is mostly simplified, but when one of my players has to sit reviewing her sheet to make sure it's correct and another one still uses an Excel spreadsheet....I don't think we really saw a shift in my group. I fully agree that buffs in 3E and many spells did become permanent effects by high-level. The mage had a permanent polymorph, elemental protections and stat buffs that he renewed once or twice daily, as needed. And, of course, one Dispel or Greater Dispel could potentially throw all those calculations off.</p><p></p><p>I can understand wanting to remove those effective perma-buffs, as we called them. What I DON'T like is transforming so many spells into things like rituals, making them more like one-shot magic items that often take so long to use as to be no fun at all. Ritual use is so rare in the game that it was actually an event when the party 10th level wizard broke one out last game. That seems odd, to me. Spells with non-combat applications seem to have taken it on the chin in 4E and I'd like to see something more like a hybrid of 3E and 4E's approach. More diversity in spell options, with less problematic 24-hour Greater Polymorphs and Improved Strengths and what have you.</p><p></p><p>I suspect removing or limiting variable spell durations would go a long way to addressing those criticisms.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WizarDru, post: 5917744, member: 151"] I would like the return of long-duration spells. I fully recognize the issue of confusing durations, burdensome bookkeeping and meta-game issues that some of these things can generate. Having played a 3/3.5E game from 1st to 30th level, I DIG. But I find the spell durations and magical effects of 4E go too far in the other direction. They render spells weak to make them regular effects or so combat focused that much of the utility of spells (and, dare I say it, their [i]magic[/i]) is diminished or totally removed. In large part, what I'm hearing as criticisms of long-duration spells is really people complaining about long duration [b]BUFFS[/B]. Lord knows that 4E's tons of stacking and variable effects and statuses do absolutely nothing in my mind to relieve that burden. When I look at a target on the field who is bloodied, slowed, flanked, currently cannot take opportunity attacks, is cursed, has a mark, takes -2 to attacks until Player X's next turn, is taking 2 points of ongoing fire damage, has one power that [i]may[/i] recharge on his turn and is poisoned? I'm not feeling like 4E has actually simplified my game as much as I'd hoped. The issue of calculating and recalculating bonuses and attacks is in all versions. 4E's math is mostly simplified, but when one of my players has to sit reviewing her sheet to make sure it's correct and another one still uses an Excel spreadsheet....I don't think we really saw a shift in my group. I fully agree that buffs in 3E and many spells did become permanent effects by high-level. The mage had a permanent polymorph, elemental protections and stat buffs that he renewed once or twice daily, as needed. And, of course, one Dispel or Greater Dispel could potentially throw all those calculations off. I can understand wanting to remove those effective perma-buffs, as we called them. What I DON'T like is transforming so many spells into things like rituals, making them more like one-shot magic items that often take so long to use as to be no fun at all. Ritual use is so rare in the game that it was actually an event when the party 10th level wizard broke one out last game. That seems odd, to me. Spells with non-combat applications seem to have taken it on the chin in 4E and I'd like to see something more like a hybrid of 3E and 4E's approach. More diversity in spell options, with less problematic 24-hour Greater Polymorphs and Improved Strengths and what have you. I suspect removing or limiting variable spell durations would go a long way to addressing those criticisms. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I want a return to long duration spells in D&D Next.
Top