Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 9229429" data-attributes="member: 6785785">I would expect attacks to use the normal process... the attackers would need to hit the climbing PCs AC and do damage. If that happened, then I would expect the climber to have to make a check or a savin throw or similar to avoid falling. But I'd explain all of this at the start, or when it became introduced.That's my point. One is for the character, the other is for the player. I don't know what this means. I've never had this problem from sharing DCs in D&amp;D. No. It's a choice the GM makes, so any negative element of it is their responsibility. Things can move along at varying speeds. My point is by sharing DCs, I often avoid the barrage of questions that come from a player having incomplete information. It allows us to actually get on with the climbing and, more importantly I assume, whatever they are climbing for, rather than answering clarifying questions because of vague phrasing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 9229429, member: 6785785"] I would expect attacks to use the normal process... the attackers would need to hit the climbing PCs AC and do damage. If that happened, then I would expect the climber to have to make a check or a savin throw or similar to avoid falling. But I'd explain all of this at the start, or when it became introduced. That's my point. One is for the character, the other is for the player. I don't know what this means. I've never had this problem from sharing DCs in D&D. No. It's a choice the GM makes, so any negative element of it is their responsibility. Things can move along at varying speeds. My point is by sharing DCs, I often avoid the barrage of questions that come from a player having incomplete information. It allows us to actually get on with the climbing and, more importantly I assume, whatever they are climbing for, rather than answering clarifying questions because of vague phrasing. [/QUOTE]

Verification