Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fanboy2000" data-source="post: 4932351" data-attributes="member: 19998">Around the time I joined, there was thread titled something along the lines of "3e inhibits creativity" The premise of the thread was a designer (a third party designer) who wanted to give an imp disguise. He was designing an adventure and he wanted to have an imp NPC disguised as a survivor of some kind of razing. Imps, in the 3e MM, don't have disguised listed. He wanted to obey the rules and not have players yell at him for not getting the rules rights, so he went another route. He felt that 3e inhibited him from giving his imp disguise as a skill and started a thread to complain about it.The response, as one might expect, was hostile. First people pointed out how, under the rules, it was possible to give an imp ranks in disguise. Things went downhill from there, the thread became quite long.After that, I've seen numerous threads on how the bard sucks, it still sucks under 3.5, the ranger sucks, the ranger still sucks, and how to fix those classes.One last thing, back when Buffy: The Vampire Slayer was on TV, I was a fan and spent a fair amount of time on a mailing list dedicated to the show. It was a pastime on that list to complain about the current season and how previous seasons were so much better and the show is clearly straying from its roots.</blockquote>