Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Elethiomel" data-source="post: 4836897" data-attributes="member: 49897"><p>After noticing the missing kama and having the suspicion that it was not the real body, he failed his saving throw against the illusion. He is now convinced there's a body there, and that the body looks exactly like the vampire. <strong>That does not mean that all his suspicions are allayed</strong>. He may still believe it is a replacement body polymorphed (or, for example, the vampire's twin killed and preserved for this purpose). He just doesn't believe the body itself is an illusion.</p><p></p><p>He's already noticed something is amiss (the kama is gone, the vampire was acting strangely stupidly by fighting next to his coffin to name two things that came through the OP's post). The illusion does not negate these things. He noticed them before any save was called for. If it had been a real replacement body (or even the actual body of the vampire) he could have tested for an illusion (by interacting) and found none (just the same result as a failed will save vs illusion). He could still assume the body was trickery due to other evidence (like the missing kama and the suspiciously stupid vampire). This is what I mean when I say "an illusion is not more convincing than the real thing".</p><p></p><p>As I understand the OP, the statement "I don't think this is the real body" was what triggered the Will save, which means the statement came before the save, which means that the suspicion that something was wrong was already in place without taking the save into account.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Elethiomel, post: 4836897, member: 49897"] After noticing the missing kama and having the suspicion that it was not the real body, he failed his saving throw against the illusion. He is now convinced there's a body there, and that the body looks exactly like the vampire. [b]That does not mean that all his suspicions are allayed[/b]. He may still believe it is a replacement body polymorphed (or, for example, the vampire's twin killed and preserved for this purpose). He just doesn't believe the body itself is an illusion. He's already noticed something is amiss (the kama is gone, the vampire was acting strangely stupidly by fighting next to his coffin to name two things that came through the OP's post). The illusion does not negate these things. He noticed them before any save was called for. If it had been a real replacement body (or even the actual body of the vampire) he could have tested for an illusion (by interacting) and found none (just the same result as a failed will save vs illusion). He could still assume the body was trickery due to other evidence (like the missing kama and the suspiciously stupid vampire). This is what I mean when I say "an illusion is not more convincing than the real thing". As I understand the OP, the statement "I don't think this is the real body" was what triggered the Will save, which means the statement came before the save, which means that the suspicion that something was wrong was already in place without taking the save into account. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
Top