Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bercilac" data-source="post: 4839049" data-attributes="member: 82608"><p><strong>What game are we playing here?</strong></p><p></p><p>There are two classes of argument posted so far:</p><p></p><p>1. The characters, having failed a save, believe the illusion. The players are bound by the characters, and must not attempt to reverse their fate.</p><p></p><p>2. The characters, while not immediately perceiving an "illusion" per se, can still deduce that something is amiss, and will go to all ends to test their reality, eventually pulling a thread that unravels the entire narrative...</p><p></p><p>Both assume that the rules act as an intermediary between the players and the DM, to determine who "wins" the encounter. I think this is entirely missing the point of D&D. The game, at least when you're slaying the vampire and looking for his magical weapon, is about looting tombs. Under the circumstances, I would expect characters to tear apart a crypt to find a weapon. Are these characters "realistic?" No. They're psychotic. But that's what you get when you play D&D: a bunch of guys who always do the right thing, and the right thing always happens to be killing a bunch of folks and taking their stuff.</p><p></p><p>The DM's role is not to "beat" the party. If the party, having burned the "body," discover the treasure isn't there, they may never learn anything about that body's nature. But they're sure as hell going to trash the place anyway looking for treasure.</p><p></p><p>The DM seemed to be worried that in doing so they would discover that the body was an illusion, and that the vampire was still alive and, presumably, nearby. Tough luck for the vampire, not for the game, or for the DM. Who cares if it's metagaming? Who cares what's a mind-affecting illusion, a phantasm, or a glamour (this GM is obviously using extreme house rules anyway, so those arguments are moot)? You don't need to justify the character's acting in a strange fashion in the pursuit of treasure, even if a normal person would NEVER EVER EVER act that way. Because they're not normal people: they're heroes. It's not meta-game, it's the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bercilac, post: 4839049, member: 82608"] [b]What game are we playing here?[/b] There are two classes of argument posted so far: 1. The characters, having failed a save, believe the illusion. The players are bound by the characters, and must not attempt to reverse their fate. 2. The characters, while not immediately perceiving an "illusion" per se, can still deduce that something is amiss, and will go to all ends to test their reality, eventually pulling a thread that unravels the entire narrative... Both assume that the rules act as an intermediary between the players and the DM, to determine who "wins" the encounter. I think this is entirely missing the point of D&D. The game, at least when you're slaying the vampire and looking for his magical weapon, is about looting tombs. Under the circumstances, I would expect characters to tear apart a crypt to find a weapon. Are these characters "realistic?" No. They're psychotic. But that's what you get when you play D&D: a bunch of guys who always do the right thing, and the right thing always happens to be killing a bunch of folks and taking their stuff. The DM's role is not to "beat" the party. If the party, having burned the "body," discover the treasure isn't there, they may never learn anything about that body's nature. But they're sure as hell going to trash the place anyway looking for treasure. The DM seemed to be worried that in doing so they would discover that the body was an illusion, and that the vampire was still alive and, presumably, nearby. Tough luck for the vampire, not for the game, or for the DM. Who cares if it's metagaming? Who cares what's a mind-affecting illusion, a phantasm, or a glamour (this GM is obviously using extreme house rules anyway, so those arguments are moot)? You don't need to justify the character's acting in a strange fashion in the pursuit of treasure, even if a normal person would NEVER EVER EVER act that way. Because they're not normal people: they're heroes. It's not meta-game, it's the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
Top