Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NewJeffCT" data-source="post: 4841711" data-attributes="member: 10784"><p>No, he should not have seen the kama there. He should have been convinced the body itself was real. He may then think, "oh,maybe the kama is underneath the body" or "maybe the kama was dropped elsewhere" or "the kama went to a hidden location" or something else. If the kama was not part of the original illusion, it won't suddenly appear upon a failed Will save, even if this DM's illusions are on par with epic level spells.</p><p></p><p>If the PCs had first done a detect magic before the Will save ("Let's see if there are magical traps, cast detect magic first!") then it clearly would not have been metagaming. Even after the failed Will save, if the players had said, "Cast detect magic, maybe the kama is hidden somewhere inside the coffin," it also clearly would not have been metagaming. Or, if they just said, "let's cast detect magic on the whole room, I want that magical kama, where is it?" I think they are fine as well.</p><p></p><p>Additionally, since the PCs have had extensive experience with illusions, I don't think it's out of line for them to have asked for a detect magic in their situation, especially since there was missing treasure. Maybe the kama was hidden by illusion? I don't think the way the OP phrased it in game was the best way to do it, but I don't think he was out of line in asking for a detect magic there.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NewJeffCT, post: 4841711, member: 10784"] No, he should not have seen the kama there. He should have been convinced the body itself was real. He may then think, "oh,maybe the kama is underneath the body" or "maybe the kama was dropped elsewhere" or "the kama went to a hidden location" or something else. If the kama was not part of the original illusion, it won't suddenly appear upon a failed Will save, even if this DM's illusions are on par with epic level spells. If the PCs had first done a detect magic before the Will save ("Let's see if there are magical traps, cast detect magic first!") then it clearly would not have been metagaming. Even after the failed Will save, if the players had said, "Cast detect magic, maybe the kama is hidden somewhere inside the coffin," it also clearly would not have been metagaming. Or, if they just said, "let's cast detect magic on the whole room, I want that magical kama, where is it?" I think they are fine as well. Additionally, since the PCs have had extensive experience with illusions, I don't think it's out of line for them to have asked for a detect magic in their situation, especially since there was missing treasure. Maybe the kama was hidden by illusion? I don't think the way the OP phrased it in game was the best way to do it, but I don't think he was out of line in asking for a detect magic there. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
Top