Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Moff_Tarkin" data-source="post: 4848361" data-attributes="member: 14175"><p>I know its my fault. When I make an argument I don’t really put enough thought into making sure other people understand what I am talking about. Its easy to forget that other people don’t have the all the information on the argument that you do, and its easy to think that just because its clear to you that its clear to them.</p><p></p><p>But now that I have finally made it clear let me add a little more to the argument that was supposed to be discussed. If the failed Will save causes us to stop believing the body is fake.</p><p></p><p>The definition that irdeggman used in his last post for search, spot, and knowledge checks is essentially the same as mine. So we are in agreement there. Those skills or for determining what, and how much information your characters have. Succeeding on those skills gives your characters more information, but doesn’t take away information your characters already have. If your investigating a crime scene, and roll a 1 on your search check, you fail to find any new evidence. But the evidence you have is still there; failing your search check doesn’t make the bloody glove you found in the garbage can dissapear.</p><p></p><p>We already had evidence that the corpse was fake, the missing kama. Failing a Will save means we gather no new information, and find no further proof that the corpse is fake. But the clue of the missing kama was still there.</p><p></p><p>The reason I think the metagaiming argument is off track is this. This first time we called the corpse a fake there had been no save, and none of us had any information about the module. I don’t think anyone is making the claim that calling the corpse fake at that time was metagaming. The accusations of metagaming are there because we continued to call the corpse a fake “after” the save was failed. That’s why the original argument of this topic was supposed to be, “If our characters think a body is a fake, does failing a Will save cause us to give up on that belief. And if so, why.” If I had made the question more clear, we might not have gone on this long. Its my fault that we went on for so many pages without the real question even being asked, much rather answered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Moff_Tarkin, post: 4848361, member: 14175"] I know its my fault. When I make an argument I don’t really put enough thought into making sure other people understand what I am talking about. Its easy to forget that other people don’t have the all the information on the argument that you do, and its easy to think that just because its clear to you that its clear to them. But now that I have finally made it clear let me add a little more to the argument that was supposed to be discussed. If the failed Will save causes us to stop believing the body is fake. The definition that irdeggman used in his last post for search, spot, and knowledge checks is essentially the same as mine. So we are in agreement there. Those skills or for determining what, and how much information your characters have. Succeeding on those skills gives your characters more information, but doesn’t take away information your characters already have. If your investigating a crime scene, and roll a 1 on your search check, you fail to find any new evidence. But the evidence you have is still there; failing your search check doesn’t make the bloody glove you found in the garbage can dissapear. We already had evidence that the corpse was fake, the missing kama. Failing a Will save means we gather no new information, and find no further proof that the corpse is fake. But the clue of the missing kama was still there. The reason I think the metagaiming argument is off track is this. This first time we called the corpse a fake there had been no save, and none of us had any information about the module. I don’t think anyone is making the claim that calling the corpse fake at that time was metagaming. The accusations of metagaming are there because we continued to call the corpse a fake “after” the save was failed. That’s why the original argument of this topic was supposed to be, “If our characters think a body is a fake, does failing a Will save cause us to give up on that belief. And if so, why.” If I had made the question more clear, we might not have gone on this long. Its my fault that we went on for so many pages without the real question even being asked, much rather answered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
I want to believe
Top