Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I was right about Shield Master
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7511259" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>Please refer to the Quotes above for how our conversation got started.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As seen above, the comment I made that got the whole ball rolling included the idea that bonus actions are tied to attack actions. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Well at least we finally can agree on this one. I was starting to think you were a lost cause.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, that's what you are wanting to comment about now. But that's not how the conversation started. That comment didn't come up until after our initial 2 comments above. Maybe you should think about why it came up then.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since my comment that started our conversation didn't include anything at all about what you are wanting to discuss now it was obviously mentioned by me for some reason. It should be easy to understand that it was brought up as the proof of the premise that a sufficient amount of bonus actions are tied to an action and thus with that being true it would be improbable that the game wasn't designed with all of those bonus actions like this in mind. </p><p></p><p>That you disagree with the thought about most of the popular bonus actions being tied to actions doesn't invalidate the logic I'm using. It only means a different evidence of the premise that there is a sufficient number of bonus actions tied to an action needs shown. That's why I keep saying it doesn't really matter and that it's tangential even though you seem to be so focused, even to the point that you think that's what our discussion has always been about.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But I've never been trying to discuss if most common bonus actions are tied to an attack action. You keep coming back to the 3rd comment made in our discussion like it's the key area of debate and contention but I keep having to remind you that what started this discussion wasn't that comment. Ultimately, I don't care if we agree on that comment or not because it's tangential to the point of contention that started our conversation.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7511259, member: 6795602"] Please refer to the Quotes above for how our conversation got started. As seen above, the comment I made that got the whole ball rolling included the idea that bonus actions are tied to attack actions. Well at least we finally can agree on this one. I was starting to think you were a lost cause. No, that's what you are wanting to comment about now. But that's not how the conversation started. That comment didn't come up until after our initial 2 comments above. Maybe you should think about why it came up then. Since my comment that started our conversation didn't include anything at all about what you are wanting to discuss now it was obviously mentioned by me for some reason. It should be easy to understand that it was brought up as the proof of the premise that a sufficient amount of bonus actions are tied to an action and thus with that being true it would be improbable that the game wasn't designed with all of those bonus actions like this in mind. That you disagree with the thought about most of the popular bonus actions being tied to actions doesn't invalidate the logic I'm using. It only means a different evidence of the premise that there is a sufficient number of bonus actions tied to an action needs shown. That's why I keep saying it doesn't really matter and that it's tangential even though you seem to be so focused, even to the point that you think that's what our discussion has always been about. But I've never been trying to discuss if most common bonus actions are tied to an attack action. You keep coming back to the 3rd comment made in our discussion like it's the key area of debate and contention but I keep having to remind you that what started this discussion wasn't that comment. Ultimately, I don't care if we agree on that comment or not because it's tangential to the point of contention that started our conversation. LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I was right about Shield Master
Top