Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 8064824" data-attributes="member: 2525">I was comparing it to the discussion of PF1, not 5e. It's not being discussed even as much as PF1. Not before (though it's not being discussed as much as PF1 was being discussed when it began either), I mean right this moment PF1 is still being discussed more than PF2. At first I thought it was just &quot;PF1 games need time to come to an end&quot; but it's over a year now and STILL PF2 rate of discussion is lower than PF1. That isn't the comparison. I am not talking about &quot;Paizo&quot; as a game company. I am talking specifically about PF2. Which means lumping all their other games in makes that stat not helpful. I don't know what Warhorn is, and have never heard of it. I can say that AL games shouldn't be a metric of...anything. It's less than 5% of D&amp;D games played. Regardless, my focus is more on whether PF2 is catching on WITH PF1 FANS. And I am not sure it is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 8064824, member: 2525"] I was comparing it to the discussion of PF1, not 5e. It's not being discussed even as much as PF1. Not before (though it's not being discussed as much as PF1 was being discussed when it began either), I mean right this moment PF1 is still being discussed more than PF2. At first I thought it was just "PF1 games need time to come to an end" but it's over a year now and STILL PF2 rate of discussion is lower than PF1. That isn't the comparison. I am not talking about "Paizo" as a game company. I am talking specifically about PF2. Which means lumping all their other games in makes that stat not helpful. I don't know what Warhorn is, and have never heard of it. I can say that AL games shouldn't be a metric of...anything. It's less than 5% of D&D games played. Regardless, my focus is more on whether PF2 is catching on WITH PF1 FANS. And I am not sure it is. [/QUOTE]

Verification