Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dualazi" data-source="post: 7063209" data-attributes="member: 6855537">I'd argue that we already have most of what's listed there, or will probably get it by year's end. We have EK and swordmage for gishy characters, and I'd be interested to hear how you feel those don't meet your expectations. We already have an alchemist, and &quot;AoE class&quot; is pretty much filled by just being a caster and loading up on AoE Spells. 4-6 are all in the pipeline essentially with the mystic; jedi is just soul knife with the right discipline choice, there's a bow-themed discipline for the kai-lord, and mystic is pretty much exactly the right chassis for any biotic class from ME (although it beggars the question of why futuristic sci-fi classes should be ported to D&amp;D anyhow).Summoner would be a welcome addition, though, and that's one we definitely don't have at present. I'd think it would have to be focused around a single powerful summon, since necromancer already has the horde bit covered.I'd like to see the 4e shaman return in some capacity, and that too could be another pet class.strangely enough we don't have a ninja subclass yet, and while it's very easy to simply refluff a rogue as one, you'd think the popularity of it would have included an example in the UA articles, doubly so since the samurai was included. Maybe they figure it'll be so popular they don't need extra feedback on it.A polymorph/transformation themed class. I would personally rather see this as a warlock pact option but there's certainly other ways to do it.Aside from the warlord, most of my wants are either niche classes that are unlikely to come about, or are easily done as subclasses to existing options, or the distant third option of being a prestige class. The number of ideas I can think up off hand for a full 20 level class with multiple subclasses is fairly slim.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dualazi, post: 7063209, member: 6855537"] I'd argue that we already have most of what's listed there, or will probably get it by year's end. We have EK and swordmage for gishy characters, and I'd be interested to hear how you feel those don't meet your expectations. We already have an alchemist, and "AoE class" is pretty much filled by just being a caster and loading up on AoE Spells. 4-6 are all in the pipeline essentially with the mystic; jedi is just soul knife with the right discipline choice, there's a bow-themed discipline for the kai-lord, and mystic is pretty much exactly the right chassis for any biotic class from ME (although it beggars the question of why futuristic sci-fi classes should be ported to D&D anyhow). Summoner would be a welcome addition, though, and that's one we definitely don't have at present. I'd think it would have to be focused around a single powerful summon, since necromancer already has the horde bit covered. I'd like to see the 4e shaman return in some capacity, and that too could be another pet class. strangely enough we don't have a ninja subclass yet, and while it's very easy to simply refluff a rogue as one, you'd think the popularity of it would have included an example in the UA articles, doubly so since the samurai was included. Maybe they figure it'll be so popular they don't need extra feedback on it. A polymorph/transformation themed class. I would personally rather see this as a warlock pact option but there's certainly other ways to do it. Aside from the warlord, most of my wants are either niche classes that are unlikely to come about, or are easily done as subclasses to existing options, or the distant third option of being a prestige class. The number of ideas I can think up off hand for a full 20 level class with multiple subclasses is fairly slim. [/QUOTE]

Verification