Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Idea for a mass combat scenario, seeking advice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 4873610" data-attributes="member: 82425"><p>I dont know if this is applicable to you, but I have been contemplating the same thing and wondering how to handle.</p><p>Bit of background 1st. Back in 3rd edition days I tried a big battle...it went for weeks, and didnt really keep the players interest the whole time. I wanted it epic, and made it too epic : Too much to do, too much to keep track of, too much to go wrong. So building on that I came to the conclusion that I didnt want to try to emulate a tactical wargame again.</p><p>Rather, this time around, I am choosing to represent the battle as a series of skill challenges (Note : We have a kick arse skill challenge system with supporting software <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />) whereby I will define what is going on in the battle with possible events. Players can choose how to contribute (someone might want to use a heal skill in the triarge, someone else might want to work on inspiring the troops, someone else might want to get into the thick of it).</p><p>Based on this dynamics are defined (e.g. How many troops remaining at the north tower?) and influenced by player skill contribution. Triggered events then lead to further skill challenges (e.g. The number of troops on north tower gets to zero...north tower overrun) or even(/inevitably) to pre defined (limited scope) combat encounters. For instance, troops cant really cope with the trolls smashing through the front gates, its up to the heros to seal that breach.</p><p>From my position, the point is NOT that troops are litteraly represented as markers on a map, but that the battle is followable (i.e. the current state of play is transparent to the players) and transitions from state to state, and that the players have a real and understood ability to contribute to the result and influence the outcome.</p><p>I figure this way I can represent a battle and still be true to the game the 4e actually is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 4873610, member: 82425"] I dont know if this is applicable to you, but I have been contemplating the same thing and wondering how to handle. Bit of background 1st. Back in 3rd edition days I tried a big battle...it went for weeks, and didnt really keep the players interest the whole time. I wanted it epic, and made it too epic : Too much to do, too much to keep track of, too much to go wrong. So building on that I came to the conclusion that I didnt want to try to emulate a tactical wargame again. Rather, this time around, I am choosing to represent the battle as a series of skill challenges (Note : We have a kick arse skill challenge system with supporting software :)) whereby I will define what is going on in the battle with possible events. Players can choose how to contribute (someone might want to use a heal skill in the triarge, someone else might want to work on inspiring the troops, someone else might want to get into the thick of it). Based on this dynamics are defined (e.g. How many troops remaining at the north tower?) and influenced by player skill contribution. Triggered events then lead to further skill challenges (e.g. The number of troops on north tower gets to zero...north tower overrun) or even(/inevitably) to pre defined (limited scope) combat encounters. For instance, troops cant really cope with the trolls smashing through the front gates, its up to the heros to seal that breach. From my position, the point is NOT that troops are litteraly represented as markers on a map, but that the battle is followable (i.e. the current state of play is transparent to the players) and transitions from state to state, and that the players have a real and understood ability to contribute to the result and influence the outcome. I figure this way I can represent a battle and still be true to the game the 4e actually is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Idea for a mass combat scenario, seeking advice
Top