Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Phoenix8008" data-source="post: 4872888" data-attributes="member: 211">Well you don't need me to repeat what Stonegod, Covaithe and Boddynock said concerning the LEW Super-Fiasco. That said, I have two points to mention which are repeating things already said. One which Don said already and one which Stonegod brought up.So right there is a vote of confidence from me that Don is already thinking ahead of the curve of where we were back when this came up in LEW. Covaithe covered several other points as well that would make it possible I believe to pull off such a feat.*Only one adventure per DM. (This could still get broken if the original DM quit and the game judge had to pick it up when they were already a DM for one of the connected adventures.)*Make sure they can start and end independently. If any of them rely on any others time-wise it won't work out.Those are the big two for me. Tying up most of the population of adventurers at once wouldn't be a big deal if it was four separate adventures. And if this mega-adventure is going to work it really needs to be just four separate adventures linked thematically. If it can be that, then I think it could work. If the adventures are not directly connected, then it won't be an issue for a DM of one of these adventures to have a character playing in one of the others as well.So there are my thoughts on the matter. I look forward to other discussion and to see what happens. If it could be pulled off, I'd love to be a part of it. Don't know if Id have time to DM one of the adventures, but as a player I'd love to be involved!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Phoenix8008, post: 4872888, member: 211"] Well you don't need me to repeat what Stonegod, Covaithe and Boddynock said concerning the LEW Super-Fiasco. That said, I have two points to mention which are repeating things already said. One which Don said already and one which Stonegod brought up. So right there is a vote of confidence from me that Don is already thinking ahead of the curve of where we were back when this came up in LEW. Covaithe covered several other points as well that would make it possible I believe to pull off such a feat. *Only one adventure per DM. (This could still get broken if the original DM quit and the game judge had to pick it up when they were already a DM for one of the connected adventures.) *Make sure they can start and end independently. If any of them rely on any others time-wise it won't work out. Those are the big two for me. Tying up most of the population of adventurers at once wouldn't be a big deal if it was four separate adventures. And if this mega-adventure is going to work it really needs to be just four separate adventures linked thematically. If it can be that, then I think it could work. If the adventures are not directly connected, then it won't be an issue for a DM of one of these adventures to have a character playing in one of the others as well. So there are my thoughts on the matter. I look forward to other discussion and to see what happens. If it could be pulled off, I'd love to be a part of it. Don't know if Id have time to DM one of the adventures, but as a player I'd love to be involved! [/QUOTE]

Verification