Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="azhrei_fje" data-source="post: 2745881" data-attributes="member: 12966">Does anyone else see the Spellcraft DCs listed in the article as being off a little?&nbsp; If I make a table out of the text in the article, it looks like this:[CODE]Min CL&nbsp; &nbsp; Article DC&nbsp; &nbsp; Proposed DC1st&nbsp; &nbsp; 20&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 203rd&nbsp; &nbsp; 25&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 255th&nbsp; &nbsp; 30&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 309th&nbsp; &nbsp; 35&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 4012th&nbsp; &nbsp; 40&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 47[/CODE]It seems to me that the progression is wrong.&nbsp; If every CL +2 increases the DC by +5, then an item with a minimum CL of 9th should have a DC of 40, not 35.&nbsp; And I chose 47 for the DC at 12th caster level as a compromise between 45 and 50.Edit: updated table to show DCs from the article and my proposed DCs.I would also change the wondrous item DC progression, but I haven't worked out the details yet.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="azhrei_fje, post: 2745881, member: 12966"] Does anyone else see the Spellcraft DCs listed in the article as being off a little? If I make a table out of the text in the article, it looks like this: [CODE]Min CL Article DC Proposed DC 1st 20 20 3rd 25 25 5th 30 30 9th 35 40 12th 40 47[/CODE] It seems to me that the progression is wrong. If every CL +2 increases the DC by +5, then an item with a minimum CL of 9th should have a DC of 40, not 35. And I chose 47 for the DC at 12th caster level as a compromise between 45 and 50. [i]Edit: updated table to show DCs from the article and my proposed DCs.[/i] I would also change the wondrous item DC progression, but I haven't worked out the details yet. [/QUOTE]

Verification