Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
If a kaiju really emerged
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6166736" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>We build *static* structures that are larger. The aircraft carrier floating on water means that no point of the structure has to bear much of the weight - load bearing is evenly distributed across the entire surface.. Also, it is mostly hollow (which is how it floats) so the aircraft carrier is surprisingly *light* for its size. Both of these things are build with few to no real moving parts, and a great deal of thought put into distributing the weight evenly across the entire footprint of the object. Large buildings are not built to do the Hokey Pokey. Contrast this with a typical, bipedal kaiju (say, Godzilla). It walks. It can do the samba, and moves seen only in pro wrestling. It has joints at ankle, knee, and hip. As it walks, legs alternate bearing the entire weight of the beast - so those joints have to take shifting loads generated by the entire beast, rather than distributing them around like we do with a skyscraper or ship.</p><p></p><p>Here's the science. The strength of a piece of material typically rises linearly with it's cross-sectional area. So, it rises like the square of a typical dimension of the piece. However, the weight of the object rises linearly with the volume of the object, so it rises like the *cube* of a typical dimension of the piece. So, you have material strengths going like r^2, but the loads going like r^3. This means that for any given material, there's a point of size beyond which it cannot support its own weight, and it will collapse. And this is without considering dynamic loads on parts of a moving object, which can be several times greater than the thing's weight.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep. But we thought they were impossible on biological grounds, not on physical ones.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Which is what I've already said, several times over - if we have kaiju, we have materials we don't know about, with properties we cannot reasonably predict. Bunker-busters are built to penetrate good old fashioned reinforced concrete and armor plate. These materials are balsa wood by comparison to what keeps a kaiju walking. Ergo, we cannot clearly say that the bunker-buster is going to do a whole heck of a lot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6166736, member: 177"] We build *static* structures that are larger. The aircraft carrier floating on water means that no point of the structure has to bear much of the weight - load bearing is evenly distributed across the entire surface.. Also, it is mostly hollow (which is how it floats) so the aircraft carrier is surprisingly *light* for its size. Both of these things are build with few to no real moving parts, and a great deal of thought put into distributing the weight evenly across the entire footprint of the object. Large buildings are not built to do the Hokey Pokey. Contrast this with a typical, bipedal kaiju (say, Godzilla). It walks. It can do the samba, and moves seen only in pro wrestling. It has joints at ankle, knee, and hip. As it walks, legs alternate bearing the entire weight of the beast - so those joints have to take shifting loads generated by the entire beast, rather than distributing them around like we do with a skyscraper or ship. Here's the science. The strength of a piece of material typically rises linearly with it's cross-sectional area. So, it rises like the square of a typical dimension of the piece. However, the weight of the object rises linearly with the volume of the object, so it rises like the *cube* of a typical dimension of the piece. So, you have material strengths going like r^2, but the loads going like r^3. This means that for any given material, there's a point of size beyond which it cannot support its own weight, and it will collapse. And this is without considering dynamic loads on parts of a moving object, which can be several times greater than the thing's weight. Yep. But we thought they were impossible on biological grounds, not on physical ones. Which is what I've already said, several times over - if we have kaiju, we have materials we don't know about, with properties we cannot reasonably predict. Bunker-busters are built to penetrate good old fashioned reinforced concrete and armor plate. These materials are balsa wood by comparison to what keeps a kaiju walking. Ergo, we cannot clearly say that the bunker-buster is going to do a whole heck of a lot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
If a kaiju really emerged
Top