Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 7381940" data-attributes="member: 37579">Irrelevant. The bard’s one unique thing is being inspiring. No classes should take that away. Just like we don't need a spellcaster class that can rage or sorerous class that sneak attack. It diminishes the classes.Similarly, the warlord should be more unique and distinct, and less like a bard (or paladin) with “spells” crossed out and “gambits” written in. It should do NEW things that no other class can do and that don’t currently exist in the game. It’d be equally boring and unimaginative to have a scout class that was just a ranger without spells, or a duskblade that was a rogue with offensive magic. Spells aren’t the wizard’s one unique thing. (Although it is close.) And the Eldritch Knight is a subclass. A warlord subclass that has a dash of inspiration wouldn’t be out of line, but it shouldn’t be the primary focus of the class.</blockquote>