Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If an NPC is telling the truth, what's the Insight DC to know they're telling the truth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bawylie" data-source="post: 7587545" data-attributes="member: 6776133"><p>I feel the same way about “everything is a check.” If nothing I can think of or do impacts the outcome of the scenario, if the majority of situations are resolved by throwing dice at something until it goes away, then I do not feel my input matters and I do not feel I am playing a game in any meaningful way. </p><p></p><p>To me, the game is playing out the scenario, not playing out the mechanics. </p><p></p><p>I think this sentiment may inform how some people felt about 4E skill challenges. Some felt that it came down to just racking up points irrespective of what was going on in the game world. While some felt the process existed independently and you hang the in-game stuff on that structure. </p><p></p><p>That may be something we’re hovering around now. How do you feel about the process of navigating scenarios via the game’s mechanics versus how you feel about navigating scenarios with your own ideas (and using the process to resolve uncertainty as warranted)? </p><p></p><p>When I introduce a new player, or invite someone, I almost always hear “but I don’t know the rules/how to play.” But I take the rules on myself. You don’t need to know them to play - you just have to be able to imagine what your character might do when put in such a scenario. </p><p></p><p>I’ve never had any success teaching a 6, 7, or 8 year old how and when to make skill checks or how the action economy works. Usually I just ask them to describe what their character is doing instead and use the rules on my side of the screen. I still have them roll the d20 and all that as normal for my game, but I do the math myself and say like “roll an 8 or higher.”</p><p></p><p>==========</p><p>Your post also makes me consider the relationship between challenge and difficulty and how that intersects with the relationship between the player’s skill and the character’s skill. </p><p></p><p>IMO we have to consider these things together and not fall on one side or the other. </p><p></p><p>Let me explain: I believe challenge (distinct from difficulty) describes a situation in which there is an objective and an obstacle to completing that objective, that the outcome of the situation is not predetermined and is uncertain (could go either way, sideways, or wild), and that a player, by making decisions (for good or ill) can influence the outcome of the situation (for good or ill). </p><p></p><p>Hand-in-hand with that, I believe difficulty is a numeric measure of how hard (or easy) something is to accomplish. </p><p></p><p>A straightforward challenge might be difficult by virtue of the task itself (jump a 45’ gap). And a hard challenge might likewise contain many easy obstacles but still be daunting (defend Helm’s Deep from basic orcs for 2 days until Gandalf shows up with Reinforcements). </p><p></p><p>Then you have this idea like “but my character is better than I am” at whatever. Stronger, smarter, something. So they would be able to do these things even if I can’t. We let the strong characters roll to lift heavy gates, why not let the smart characters roll to overcome puzzles or riddles? Fair enough, right? But that’s where we need to look at these another way. The decision to lift the gate is a player decision but the actual lift is the character’s skill. The decision how to engage the puzzle belongs to the player while the intelligence of the character is matched against the difficulty of the riddle. </p><p></p><p>So I think I come down here: I write challenges for the players to overcome, but the numeric difficulty of those challenges is measured against the character’s’ skills. </p><p></p><p>Like above, I don’t concern the kids with the difficulty just the challenge. For adults it’s more of a mix. Adults have more patience and can get into difficulty in a way kids tend not to enjoy. Like mustard or hot sauce. </p><p></p><p>I’m pretty sure I have to reject “challenge the character not the player” or vice versa. Probably a proper scenario contains a challenge whose outcome is influenced by a player’s decisions and whose difficulties are surmounted by the character’s stats/rolls, whatever. </p><p></p><p>Surprise, bawylie finds another middle path!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bawylie, post: 7587545, member: 6776133"] I feel the same way about “everything is a check.” If nothing I can think of or do impacts the outcome of the scenario, if the majority of situations are resolved by throwing dice at something until it goes away, then I do not feel my input matters and I do not feel I am playing a game in any meaningful way. To me, the game is playing out the scenario, not playing out the mechanics. I think this sentiment may inform how some people felt about 4E skill challenges. Some felt that it came down to just racking up points irrespective of what was going on in the game world. While some felt the process existed independently and you hang the in-game stuff on that structure. That may be something we’re hovering around now. How do you feel about the process of navigating scenarios via the game’s mechanics versus how you feel about navigating scenarios with your own ideas (and using the process to resolve uncertainty as warranted)? When I introduce a new player, or invite someone, I almost always hear “but I don’t know the rules/how to play.” But I take the rules on myself. You don’t need to know them to play - you just have to be able to imagine what your character might do when put in such a scenario. I’ve never had any success teaching a 6, 7, or 8 year old how and when to make skill checks or how the action economy works. Usually I just ask them to describe what their character is doing instead and use the rules on my side of the screen. I still have them roll the d20 and all that as normal for my game, but I do the math myself and say like “roll an 8 or higher.” ========== Your post also makes me consider the relationship between challenge and difficulty and how that intersects with the relationship between the player’s skill and the character’s skill. IMO we have to consider these things together and not fall on one side or the other. Let me explain: I believe challenge (distinct from difficulty) describes a situation in which there is an objective and an obstacle to completing that objective, that the outcome of the situation is not predetermined and is uncertain (could go either way, sideways, or wild), and that a player, by making decisions (for good or ill) can influence the outcome of the situation (for good or ill). Hand-in-hand with that, I believe difficulty is a numeric measure of how hard (or easy) something is to accomplish. A straightforward challenge might be difficult by virtue of the task itself (jump a 45’ gap). And a hard challenge might likewise contain many easy obstacles but still be daunting (defend Helm’s Deep from basic orcs for 2 days until Gandalf shows up with Reinforcements). Then you have this idea like “but my character is better than I am” at whatever. Stronger, smarter, something. So they would be able to do these things even if I can’t. We let the strong characters roll to lift heavy gates, why not let the smart characters roll to overcome puzzles or riddles? Fair enough, right? But that’s where we need to look at these another way. The decision to lift the gate is a player decision but the actual lift is the character’s skill. The decision how to engage the puzzle belongs to the player while the intelligence of the character is matched against the difficulty of the riddle. So I think I come down here: I write challenges for the players to overcome, but the numeric difficulty of those challenges is measured against the character’s’ skills. Like above, I don’t concern the kids with the difficulty just the challenge. For adults it’s more of a mix. Adults have more patience and can get into difficulty in a way kids tend not to enjoy. Like mustard or hot sauce. I’m pretty sure I have to reject “challenge the character not the player” or vice versa. Probably a proper scenario contains a challenge whose outcome is influenced by a player’s decisions and whose difficulties are surmounted by the character’s stats/rolls, whatever. Surprise, bawylie finds another middle path! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If an NPC is telling the truth, what's the Insight DC to know they're telling the truth?
Top