Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If an option is presented, it needs to be good enough to take.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JamesonCourage" data-source="post: 6030478" data-attributes="member: 6668292"><p>The character may object to wearing armor for a number of reasons; he's against fighting, he values freedom of movement over protection, or the like. A wizard not adding spells is peculiar, unless the extra spells do start to explore a realm he objects to (like combat). It can be analogous, but seems like it begs to be explored more than the person not wearing armor. The Wizard, after all, is defined by spellcasting, and the same is not true of armor.</p><p></p><p>In-character reason? There can definitely be some, obviously (you don't believe in combat). But this is what I'm speaking of.</p><p></p><p>My point is that you can make them more knowledgeable than those who use magic, or better than those who wear armor. And you don't need to water down those other archetypes to do it.</p><p></p><p>It seems, to me, that you don't think feats like Linguist should exist, then. It's knowledge over a feat that would increase spell-casting, after all. Again, I do think that trade-offs should <u>optionally</u> exist for those who want them. If you don't want them, awesome; stick to your 3/3/3 default.</p><p></p><p>Two things, here. One, that sage won't exist if you stick to 3/3/3 (again, problem solved). Two, the game can still make magical knowledge the pinnacle of knowledge; it simply has to outpace Lore skills. It's not my preference, but it could still easily be designed that way.</p><p></p><p>Again, how does the sage upset your game, even fictionally, if you stick to 3/3/3 builds? How does the option upset it?</p><p></p><p>This is something that doesn't relate to the 3/3/3 default and the opt-out. It could all be 3/3/3 and have the same scene-framing and action resolution you don't like.</p><p></p><p>They can support this, still, even with the opt-out. Just explain in the opt-out how it will change the game. You stick to 3/3/3 and a wide variety of PCs, and get the game you like. Done. As always, play what you like <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JamesonCourage, post: 6030478, member: 6668292"] The character may object to wearing armor for a number of reasons; he's against fighting, he values freedom of movement over protection, or the like. A wizard not adding spells is peculiar, unless the extra spells do start to explore a realm he objects to (like combat). It can be analogous, but seems like it begs to be explored more than the person not wearing armor. The Wizard, after all, is defined by spellcasting, and the same is not true of armor. In-character reason? There can definitely be some, obviously (you don't believe in combat). But this is what I'm speaking of. My point is that you can make them more knowledgeable than those who use magic, or better than those who wear armor. And you don't need to water down those other archetypes to do it. It seems, to me, that you don't think feats like Linguist should exist, then. It's knowledge over a feat that would increase spell-casting, after all. Again, I do think that trade-offs should [U]optionally[/U] exist for those who want them. If you don't want them, awesome; stick to your 3/3/3 default. Two things, here. One, that sage won't exist if you stick to 3/3/3 (again, problem solved). Two, the game can still make magical knowledge the pinnacle of knowledge; it simply has to outpace Lore skills. It's not my preference, but it could still easily be designed that way. Again, how does the sage upset your game, even fictionally, if you stick to 3/3/3 builds? How does the option upset it? This is something that doesn't relate to the 3/3/3 default and the opt-out. It could all be 3/3/3 and have the same scene-framing and action resolution you don't like. They can support this, still, even with the opt-out. Just explain in the opt-out how it will change the game. You stick to 3/3/3 and a wide variety of PCs, and get the game you like. Done. As always, play what you like :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
If an option is presented, it needs to be good enough to take.
Top