Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Greg K" data-source="post: 9788478" data-attributes="member: 5038">Probably not. Overall, I like many things about 5eI may be trying to run a short session of D&amp;D (the first time running anything since before COVID). If I do, I am going to use 2014 and, maybe, borrow a few things from 2024 that people revealed in reviews of various classes.&nbsp; While I like some 2024 changes, among my main reasons for not using 2024 are<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">disliking the some of the changes to specific base classes;</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">every class getting&nbsp; their subclass at level 3;</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">and my dislike for even more subclasses included in the 2024 PHB than the 2016 PHB.</li>
</ul>One other area I think WOTC dropped the ball with 2024 was not splitting culture from species as was done in Tales of the Valiant. So, overall, I would rather&nbsp; just have a version with those issues (for me) addressed which is not as drastic as a radically different system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Greg K, post: 9788478, member: 5038"] Probably not. Overall, I like many things about 5e I may be trying to run a short session of D&D (the first time running anything since before COVID). If I do, I am going to use 2014 and, maybe, borrow a few things from 2024 that people revealed in reviews of various classes. While I like some 2024 changes, among my main reasons for not using 2024 are [LIST] [*]disliking the some of the changes to specific base classes; [*]every class getting their subclass at level 3; [*]and my dislike for even more subclasses included in the 2024 PHB than the 2016 PHB. [/LIST] One other area I think WOTC dropped the ball with 2024 was not splitting culture from species as was done in Tales of the Valiant. So, overall, I would rather just have a version with those issues (for me) addressed which is not as drastic as a radically different system. [/QUOTE]

Verification