Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngainlyTitan" data-source="post: 9788895" data-attributes="member: 28487">I understand where you are coming from. I just do not share your response. If we go back to 3.5, I embraced 3.5 initially from Palladium, and it is clearly a better system, however, as a DM by the end of the 3.5 era, I was very sick of it. I would still play it but would not run it. If 4e had not come along I would probably switched to Savage Worlds or something else, maybe 13th age.Now I really liked 4e but after a while my players declared their dislike and would not play it. 5e came along quickly enough and I was ok with the playtest stuff that I was willing to adopt it. I now really like it, particularly the 2024 flavour of it.However, if a 6e appeared and I did not like it, I probably would not switch. I feel no obligation to play a game with the D&D label, as long as Kobold Press and others produced 5e compatible material I would likely stick with it. I have a lot of adventure material and there is a lot out there. Now in another 10 years? I don't know, I will be seventy if I am still alive. It is not that I am unwilling to try new stuff but I feel little compulsion to do so at the moment.</blockquote>