Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DonTadow" data-source="post: 5778666" data-attributes="member: 22622">Yes, as a ritual, difficult and as usual optional. Raise Dead is very common in a lot of of fantasy, but is always quite difficult to do.&nbsp; NO, this is not present in any modern day movies or media.&nbsp;&nbsp; If DnD wants to update to the times its time to update a 40 year old magic system to what everyone else is using these days.&nbsp; Magic is in DnD, it doesnt matter how its used.&nbsp; Yes, but dnd needs to return to its roots. 4 classes and let chosen abilities dictatae how those are broken down by subtypes.&nbsp; The more options you have the more chance you have of angering people.&nbsp; Yes, but again traditional, nothing fanboish. No tieflings or half-dragons.&nbsp; Drizz't has ruined more gaming sessions than any other fictional character. ::gruff batman voice:: r &quot;i'm a loner, i know i'm a party of adventures trying to do good, but i have a bad boy streak and like to work by myself&quot; Yeah but fewer and more meaningful. I'd love a system where no creature has hit points gerater than&nbsp; 100 with 100 being &quot;level 20. A cool way to help indicate power without CR. yup&nbsp;see above&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The goal is not to unite.&nbsp; Minimize the rule system, nothing crazy, make dming easy. Those are the true goals. Hasbro's goal is to grow the game and reclaim marketshare. The game won't grow if only we play it.&nbsp;&nbsp; At no pont will there be a mash of systems.&nbsp; A game designed for parties of 10 players just can't be compatible with a game designed for a party of 4 and wit ha game designed for a party of 3.&nbsp; When they say unite, they are referring to how poorly 4e divided everyone.&nbsp; How cumbersome 3.5 was.&nbsp; I believe they are taking the early editions and modernizing them.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DonTadow, post: 5778666, member: 22622"] Yes, as a ritual, difficult and as usual optional. Raise Dead is very common in a lot of of fantasy, but is always quite difficult to do. NO, this is not present in any modern day movies or media. If DnD wants to update to the times its time to update a 40 year old magic system to what everyone else is using these days. Magic is in DnD, it doesnt matter how its used. Yes, but dnd needs to return to its roots. 4 classes and let chosen abilities dictatae how those are broken down by subtypes. The more options you have the more chance you have of angering people. Yes, but again traditional, nothing fanboish. No tieflings or half-dragons. Drizz't has ruined more gaming sessions than any other fictional character. ::gruff batman voice:: r "i'm a loner, i know i'm a party of adventures trying to do good, but i have a bad boy streak and like to work by myself" Yeah but fewer and more meaningful. I'd love a system where no creature has hit points gerater than 100 with 100 being "level 20. A cool way to help indicate power without CR. yup see above The goal is not to unite. Minimize the rule system, nothing crazy, make dming easy. Those are the true goals. Hasbro's goal is to grow the game and reclaim marketshare. The game won't grow if only we play it. At no pont will there be a mash of systems. A game designed for parties of 10 players just can't be compatible with a game designed for a party of 4 and wit ha game designed for a party of 3. When they say unite, they are referring to how poorly 4e divided everyone. How cumbersome 3.5 was. I believe they are taking the early editions and modernizing them. [/QUOTE]

Verification