Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
If/how to impliment OOC points
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 4427370" data-attributes="member: 3087"><p>I know i sound like a broken record....</p><p></p><p>But if you're having trouble getting enough judges because its a big time commitment... why not hand out some sort of OOC points for it?</p><p></p><p>I just don't get the resistance to the idea. When someone's tired and frustrated and it's late at night and they've just gotten an annoying email from someone and they're thinking of quitting something fairly silly like a note of appreciation or their collection of "virtually meaningless points" can seem important.</p><p></p><p>You want more judges, right? </p><p>If "love of the game" isn't doing it for extisting settings (and Eberron is like... the best setting ever...) why are we so sure that L4W is going to be different?</p><p></p><p>[d]--[/d]</p><p></p><p>The time-for-xp thing....</p><p></p><p>I understand. I'm just confused about why we have to have a bunch of different systems...</p><p></p><p>If you give out 5 points to a DM for a month of running a game; instead of giving x number of xp on a different schedule, why not just give the player 2 points that can be spent on that character in the same way...? </p><p></p><p>One system: everybody gets something; DMs get a bit more...</p><p></p><p>[d]--[/d]</p><p></p><p>Polling's good. I will reiterate my firm belief that polls <strong>should cover a broad range of options, including options that don't seem to be popular</strong>.</p><p></p><p>Since it's potentially quite complex maybe we should break it down into areas -- then do another poll on specific systems</p><p>(having run a few I can say that it can be quite tricky to make which-option-means-which-clear)</p><p></p><p>So a general conceptual point</p><p></p><p></p><p>The poll HAS to be public and multiple choice (public b/c of the error i mentioned that allows for double posting)</p><p></p><p>1 No points of any sort (covaithe-style)</p><p></p><p>Point awards</p><p>2 ... for DMing</p><p>3 ...for judging/assisting character approval *</p><p>4 ...for a campaign log (judged by judges to be complete and informative)</p><p>5 ...for doing other _____</p><p>6 ... for every x period of time that passes in a game a player gets points for that character (time for xp)</p><p></p><p>Points (if we have them) can be spent to</p><p>7 ... improve your character's level</p><p>8 ... buy magic items for your character</p><p>9 ... buy access to rare material<p style="margin-left: 20px">this is to help prevent the flood of genasi effect -- you can spend x points to get access to that race/class </p><p>10 .. allow for the creation and play of extra characters</p><p></p><p>Limits</p><p>11... Earning of points should be capped (no matter what you can only earn this much for your contributions)</p><p>12... Spending of points should be capped per character</p><p>13 ...additional limits should be imposed to ensure that characters are not significantly more powerful than average</p><p style="margin-left: 20px">limits to insure magic items and character levels do not outshine "normal" characters </p><p></p><p>We should have a separate system for</p><p>14 ... time for xp (conflicts with choice 6)</p><p></p><p></p><p>* = I'd really like to see a "two tier" approval process for character.</p><p>A. Volunteer checks sheet; helps get it formatted properly if necessary</p><p>B. Character judge looks at it</p><p>(so if a DM running a campaign for 1 month gets 5 points then a "character checking volunteer" might get 1 point for five character sheets they've checked...)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Graf, post: 4427370, member: 3087"] I know i sound like a broken record.... But if you're having trouble getting enough judges because its a big time commitment... why not hand out some sort of OOC points for it? I just don't get the resistance to the idea. When someone's tired and frustrated and it's late at night and they've just gotten an annoying email from someone and they're thinking of quitting something fairly silly like a note of appreciation or their collection of "virtually meaningless points" can seem important. You want more judges, right? If "love of the game" isn't doing it for extisting settings (and Eberron is like... the best setting ever...) why are we so sure that L4W is going to be different? [d]--[/d] The time-for-xp thing.... I understand. I'm just confused about why we have to have a bunch of different systems... If you give out 5 points to a DM for a month of running a game; instead of giving x number of xp on a different schedule, why not just give the player 2 points that can be spent on that character in the same way...? One system: everybody gets something; DMs get a bit more... [d]--[/d] Polling's good. I will reiterate my firm belief that polls [B]should cover a broad range of options, including options that don't seem to be popular[/B]. Since it's potentially quite complex maybe we should break it down into areas -- then do another poll on specific systems (having run a few I can say that it can be quite tricky to make which-option-means-which-clear) So a general conceptual point The poll HAS to be public and multiple choice (public b/c of the error i mentioned that allows for double posting) 1 No points of any sort (covaithe-style) Point awards 2 ... for DMing 3 ...for judging/assisting character approval * 4 ...for a campaign log (judged by judges to be complete and informative) 5 ...for doing other _____ 6 ... for every x period of time that passes in a game a player gets points for that character (time for xp) Points (if we have them) can be spent to 7 ... improve your character's level 8 ... buy magic items for your character 9 ... buy access to rare material[INDENT]this is to help prevent the flood of genasi effect -- you can spend x points to get access to that race/class [/INDENT]10 .. allow for the creation and play of extra characters Limits 11... Earning of points should be capped (no matter what you can only earn this much for your contributions) 12... Spending of points should be capped per character 13 ...additional limits should be imposed to ensure that characters are not significantly more powerful than average [indent]limits to insure magic items and character levels do not outshine "normal" characters [/indent] We should have a separate system for 14 ... time for xp (conflicts with choice 6) * = I'd really like to see a "two tier" approval process for character. A. Volunteer checks sheet; helps get it formatted properly if necessary B. Character judge looks at it (so if a DM running a campaign for 1 month gets 5 points then a "character checking volunteer" might get 1 point for five character sheets they've checked...) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Playing the Game
Play by Post
Living Worlds
Living 4th Edition
If/how to impliment OOC points
Top