Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Graf" data-source="post: 4428158" data-attributes="member: 3087">I<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=238824" target="_blank"> forked the voting</a> conversation. It's a massive part of what we do and I think it should be addressed separately and very very rigorously. (my first post in the thread sucks though... kept getting stun locked by the hanging and loosing it).I also think we should just have one vote at a time per issue.Otherwise it becomes very intiimidating to the casual voter.They need to read and remember 5 or six different threads, and then process everything and then come to a decision and then painstakingly go back through the threads and vote correctly?[d]--[/d]So I'm still of the opinion that we do one thread, similar to the one I proposed, that has xteen or so questions on theory.Then try to figure out how to handle it.A second details poll will let people who are against something have a pure no vote and then get input on the final decision. Better for consensus to my mind.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Graf, post: 4428158, member: 3087"] I[URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?t=238824"] forked the voting[/URL] conversation. It's a massive part of what we do and I think it should be addressed separately and very very rigorously. (my first post in the thread sucks though... kept getting stun locked by the hanging and loosing it). I also think we should just have one vote at a time per issue. Otherwise it becomes very intiimidating to the casual voter. They need to read and remember 5 or six different threads, and then process everything and then come to a decision and then painstakingly go back through the threads and vote correctly? [d]--[/d] So I'm still of the opinion that we do one thread, similar to the one I proposed, that has xteen or so questions on theory. Then try to figure out how to handle it. A second details poll will let people who are against something have a pure no vote and then get input on the final decision. Better for consensus to my mind. [/QUOTE]

Verification