Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
If Paizo can, why can't Wizards of the Coast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mercurius" data-source="post: 5319721" data-attributes="member: 59082"><p>It is a good point that some have mentioned that my first example is that of a setting, not a rules system, and that there would likely be more outcry if we were seeing Pathfinder 2E so soon. Point taken.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Funny. Just a point of clarification, though: I am not trying to incite "company wars," I am just pointing out that it seems some companies are more prone to criticism and suspicion than others; as a general rule, the larger a company is relative to its market, the more tomatoes get thrown their way. Maybe that is how it should be?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, true. But again, I think the hyperbole about incompatibility is a bit extreme. I am reminded of some of my high school students that are up in arms with just about any change that the faculty makes to the schedule. It isn't simply the mentality that change is bad, even (possibly) good change; what I am talking about is more of a lack of creative flexibility in terms of making something compatible. It just takes a bit of imagination.</p><p></p><p>I also don't see a big problem with either fresh supplements or out-of-print rulebooks. There are <em>tons </em>of used books available and usually at affordable prices (although the 3.5E PHB is a tad expensive at $30+). And as far as fresh supplements go, part of the reason for a new edition is the glut of supplements in the previous edition; the point being, there are only so many possible new supplements, especially splats, that are possible without completely diluting content. </p><p></p><p>That said, I think the concern about being part of a living campaign is legitimate. But what to do about that? I suppose that adherents to former editions would simply have to get together and create their own. And there is always Pathfinder <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>True, and to be clear I didn't say otherwise. I am sure it is one of the primary factors, but I just don't think it is the <em>only </em>factor and that it must coincide with a wealth of new ideas and innovations. But also, you are specific with your language: the <em>release date </em>is largely determined by financial concerns, but a new edition itself is not (only).</p><p></p><p>I'm late to go pick up my daughter at kindergarten! Will return in a bit...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mercurius, post: 5319721, member: 59082"] It is a good point that some have mentioned that my first example is that of a setting, not a rules system, and that there would likely be more outcry if we were seeing Pathfinder 2E so soon. Point taken. Funny. Just a point of clarification, though: I am not trying to incite "company wars," I am just pointing out that it seems some companies are more prone to criticism and suspicion than others; as a general rule, the larger a company is relative to its market, the more tomatoes get thrown their way. Maybe that is how it should be? Yes, true. But again, I think the hyperbole about incompatibility is a bit extreme. I am reminded of some of my high school students that are up in arms with just about any change that the faculty makes to the schedule. It isn't simply the mentality that change is bad, even (possibly) good change; what I am talking about is more of a lack of creative flexibility in terms of making something compatible. It just takes a bit of imagination. I also don't see a big problem with either fresh supplements or out-of-print rulebooks. There are [I]tons [/I]of used books available and usually at affordable prices (although the 3.5E PHB is a tad expensive at $30+). And as far as fresh supplements go, part of the reason for a new edition is the glut of supplements in the previous edition; the point being, there are only so many possible new supplements, especially splats, that are possible without completely diluting content. That said, I think the concern about being part of a living campaign is legitimate. But what to do about that? I suppose that adherents to former editions would simply have to get together and create their own. And there is always Pathfinder ;) True, and to be clear I didn't say otherwise. I am sure it is one of the primary factors, but I just don't think it is the [I]only [/I]factor and that it must coincide with a wealth of new ideas and innovations. But also, you are specific with your language: the [I]release date [/I]is largely determined by financial concerns, but a new edition itself is not (only). I'm late to go pick up my daughter at kindergarten! Will return in a bit... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
If Paizo can, why can't Wizards of the Coast?
Top