Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ShinHakkaider" data-source="post: 5323688" data-attributes="member: 9213">I see what you did there. "I dont mean to refute the problem, but if you have a problem it's YOU because you're being a douche/stupid/whiner whatever."CLEVER. I dont ever recall saying that the problem of conversion was so insurmountable if you can please quote me on that one i'd appreciate it. What i said was if you have to change what is supposed to be a conversion so much from what it was originally what was the point of doing the conversion to begin with? What I said was that the conversion winds up being way to much work to balance within the framework of the new system that it's almost not worth doing the conversion.<a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/293968-if-paizo-can-why-cant-wizards-coast-2.html#post5320402" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/forum/general-rpg-discussion/293968-if-paizo-can-why-cant-wizards-coast-2.html#post5320402</a>It just looks like that you DONT WANT to see what the particular problem is or was. I already told you I'm not interested on giving WOTC more money just to use their tool for a game that I may or may not (definitely not at this point and time) continue playing.  Earlier this morning, I was writing up and at length comparison of converting a 10 man Drow group from Descent into the Depths of the earth from 1E to 2E to 3E to 4E. But then I realized that no matter how I broke it down in whatever detail you would still nullify the argument by declaring handwavium. Why bother at that point? You dont want to acknowledge that it's an issue. End of story.</blockquote>

Verification