Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8928209" data-attributes="member: 6790260">There are two different answers that both accommodate this position.You seem to be presuming certain kinds of intent with my question. I don't think this is accurate, but time will tell.I am intentionally not doing so. I could, and indeed I do have a personal definition. I consider it irrelevant and indeed counterproductive to share any such definition at this time. I wish to know how ENWorlders evaluate the statement. This isn't about generalizing to the public. It isn't about making some grand statement. I know I can't get that answer here (or, indeed, much of anywhere.) I would need a massive survey campaign and tons of money, neither of which I have.As noted above, I do have an opinion. I consider it counterproductive to share that opinion at this time. Perhaps, in a week or two, after the votes have largely settled, I will give my own personal perspective. I don't want it to taint the results. I genuinely wish to know how you (and others) feel about it, whatever YOU consider to be "cheating" or "exploiting."It is slightly more than just vague curiosity, but yes, I am quite well aware that this tells me very little in a broad or scientific sense.See above. I am choosing not to specify. Each respondent should use the meaning they think best.</blockquote>