Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 8928399" data-attributes="member: 6790260">If that were the only question being asked, then yes. It is not. I think the contrast between cheating and exploiting is relevant. To ask both questions simultaneously in this way would require 36 (your six options squared, since we would need every possible combo of A-F and 1-6) plus two more for the &quot;not enough info&quot; and &quot;my answer isn't included here, I will explain&quot; options. The forum software isn't coded to permit 38 different poll choices.As an aside, despite being extremely strongly opposed to cheating (and, I hope, having high standards about what is acceptable behavior), I genuinely believe people are incorrectly assuming &quot;cheating&quot; is perfectly well-defined while &quot;exploiting&quot; is not, purely based on conversations from this very forum. (E.g., many people consider it impossible for the GM to cheat, even if they knowingly and intentionally break the rules they have claimed to agree to abide by. This clearly indicates that &quot;cheating&quot; is not as universally agreed as people think, hence my desire not to narrowly define it.)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 8928399, member: 6790260"] If that were the only question being asked, then yes. It is not. I think the contrast between cheating and exploiting is relevant. To ask both questions simultaneously in this way would require 36 (your six options squared, since we would need every possible combo of A-F and 1-6) plus two more for the "not enough info" and "my answer isn't included here, I will explain" options. The forum software isn't coded to permit 38 different poll choices. As an aside, despite being extremely strongly opposed to cheating (and, I hope, having high standards about what is acceptable behavior), I genuinely believe people are incorrectly assuming "cheating" is perfectly well-defined while "exploiting" is not, purely based on conversations from this very forum. (E.g., many people consider it [I]impossible[/I] for the GM to cheat, even if they knowingly and intentionally break the rules they have claimed to agree to abide by. This clearly indicates that "cheating" is not as universally agreed as people think, hence my desire not to narrowly define it.) [/QUOTE]

Verification