Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If WotC Released D&D 3.75 Tomorrow....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GregoryOatmeal" data-source="post: 5725702" data-attributes="member: 6667661"><p>The consensus seems to be that PF filled this niche.</p><p></p><p>I'm sort of in that group that feels abandoned by WOTC and misses buying stuff from them. Particularly I miss having 3.5 support for products like Dark Sun.</p><p></p><p>In the interest of being inclusive and uniting gamers I think it would simply be awesome if WOTC could produce content for PF and Paizo did the same for 4E. I want Golarion for 4E and beholders in my PF. Really I just want WOTC to reach for the gamers that bought PF, as some sort of token gesture of reconciliation.</p><p></p><p>I think there's a lot of room for WOTC to experiment with the PF framework and apply 4E ideas to PF without breaking comparability or producing a new edition. Some of these ideas aren't really fleshed out and they're all optional. WOTC could produce, for example</p><p>- A smaller "D&D-Pathfinder"-branded softcover PHB for $35. Keep it under 250 pages, use D&D gods and art and IP, remove the DMing sections. If Paizo can essentially reprint the 3.5 PHB then WOTC should be able to reprint the PF PHB, no?</p><p>- A digest PHB with 150 pages and a $20 price point. Maybe put all the melee classes in their and put all of the spells in a separate spell compendium/magic supplement. Possibly experiment with applying 4E stat-blocks and straight-forwardness with 3.5 rules (I saw a interesting application of 4E presentation to 3.5 rules on the web very recently).</p><p>- An <strong>optional</strong> variant PHB that balances classes using some of the design philosophies of the 4E PHBs within the PF rules system. It would essentially be an entirely new take on the existing classes like Essentials for 4E. You would have two completely different fighter classes within the same rules framework. For example wizards from the WOTC book can select rituals and spells and can cast magic missile at-will in PF (and come with certain disadvantages over PF wizards).</p><p>- An <strong>optional </strong>Pathfinder Arcana book that incorporates some of the 4E changes like healing surges/encounter powers into Pathfinder. This could be interesting...</p><p>- Reprint the best of 3.5/3E with PF crunch.</p><p>- Reprint WOTC IPs for PF. Setting books, monster books, etc. Dragonlance, Ravenloft, Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk.</p><p></p><p>The 4E/PF audiences are so different that I don't think they're really competing anymore. People have chosen sides. It just seems unfortunate that the companies follow seem to have followed and choose sides as well. They are unable to produce content for the gaming system on the other side of the edition war.</p><p></p><p>Honestly I just miss having WOTC produce products for the game I play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GregoryOatmeal, post: 5725702, member: 6667661"] The consensus seems to be that PF filled this niche. I'm sort of in that group that feels abandoned by WOTC and misses buying stuff from them. Particularly I miss having 3.5 support for products like Dark Sun. In the interest of being inclusive and uniting gamers I think it would simply be awesome if WOTC could produce content for PF and Paizo did the same for 4E. I want Golarion for 4E and beholders in my PF. Really I just want WOTC to reach for the gamers that bought PF, as some sort of token gesture of reconciliation. I think there's a lot of room for WOTC to experiment with the PF framework and apply 4E ideas to PF without breaking comparability or producing a new edition. Some of these ideas aren't really fleshed out and they're all optional. WOTC could produce, for example - A smaller "D&D-Pathfinder"-branded softcover PHB for $35. Keep it under 250 pages, use D&D gods and art and IP, remove the DMing sections. If Paizo can essentially reprint the 3.5 PHB then WOTC should be able to reprint the PF PHB, no? - A digest PHB with 150 pages and a $20 price point. Maybe put all the melee classes in their and put all of the spells in a separate spell compendium/magic supplement. Possibly experiment with applying 4E stat-blocks and straight-forwardness with 3.5 rules (I saw a interesting application of 4E presentation to 3.5 rules on the web very recently). - An [B]optional[/B] variant PHB that balances classes using some of the design philosophies of the 4E PHBs within the PF rules system. It would essentially be an entirely new take on the existing classes like Essentials for 4E. You would have two completely different fighter classes within the same rules framework. For example wizards from the WOTC book can select rituals and spells and can cast magic missile at-will in PF (and come with certain disadvantages over PF wizards). - An [B]optional [/B]Pathfinder Arcana book that incorporates some of the 4E changes like healing surges/encounter powers into Pathfinder. This could be interesting... - Reprint the best of 3.5/3E with PF crunch. - Reprint WOTC IPs for PF. Setting books, monster books, etc. Dragonlance, Ravenloft, Forgotten Realms, Greyhawk. The 4E/PF audiences are so different that I don't think they're really competing anymore. People have chosen sides. It just seems unfortunate that the companies follow seem to have followed and choose sides as well. They are unable to produce content for the gaming system on the other side of the edition war. Honestly I just miss having WOTC produce products for the game I play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If WotC Released D&D 3.75 Tomorrow....
Top