Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If WotC Released D&D 3.75 Tomorrow....
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="delericho" data-source="post: 5726847" data-attributes="member: 22424"><p>Incidentally, it occurs to me that the smartest thing WotC could do at this point in time might well be to open 4e under the OGL.</p><p></p><p>Here's my thinking;</p><p></p><p>- WotC do a poor job on adventures (to put it mildly). They have also shown they have very little interest in doing adventures, since they don't make money. Opening the game just makes it so much easier for others to support the game with adventures, which can surely only be a good thing.</p><p></p><p>- Likewise, WotC's support for settings has been very limited - for each setting they do a couple of books and then stop. Again, there's not much money in settings. So, it probably makes sense to make it easier for others to support the game with settings material.</p><p></p><p>- In the area WotC <em>do</em> care about (player-side supplements), they don't have to worry about competition. The DDI is the killer app, and it's something that only WotC have access to. Thus, there's no market for third-party competition in this area.</p><p></p><p>Of course, this would also open the door for Paizo (or someone else) taking the 4e rules and incorporating them into their own game. Which seems like a pretty big risk, except:</p><p></p><p>1) Paizo <em>won't</em> do this. One of the big selling points of Pathfinder is that it is <em>not</em> 4e. Pulling in the 4e rules, in whole or in any significant part, would be a bad move.</p><p></p><p>2) If someone else builds a 3.75e using 3e and 4e mechanics, that's just more competition for Pathfinder - any competitor would be too small to seriously bother WotC.</p><p></p><p>3) If and when someone <em>does</em> lift some part of the rules and develop them in an interesting manner, those advances would necessarily also be open - meaning that WotC could take any good innovation and roll it right back into D&D.</p><p></p><p>4) There's almost nothing in 4e that can't be done using the OGL anyway. Healing surges are pretty much just a re-codification of Reserve Points (which are in Unearthed Arcana, and so open content); Daily, Encounter and At-will powers all already exist, if not by name; Minions are just weaker monsters, and elites and solos more powerful ones; and so on. All formally opening the rules <em>actually</em> does is remove even the risk of litigation from the equation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="delericho, post: 5726847, member: 22424"] Incidentally, it occurs to me that the smartest thing WotC could do at this point in time might well be to open 4e under the OGL. Here's my thinking; - WotC do a poor job on adventures (to put it mildly). They have also shown they have very little interest in doing adventures, since they don't make money. Opening the game just makes it so much easier for others to support the game with adventures, which can surely only be a good thing. - Likewise, WotC's support for settings has been very limited - for each setting they do a couple of books and then stop. Again, there's not much money in settings. So, it probably makes sense to make it easier for others to support the game with settings material. - In the area WotC [i]do[/i] care about (player-side supplements), they don't have to worry about competition. The DDI is the killer app, and it's something that only WotC have access to. Thus, there's no market for third-party competition in this area. Of course, this would also open the door for Paizo (or someone else) taking the 4e rules and incorporating them into their own game. Which seems like a pretty big risk, except: 1) Paizo [i]won't[/i] do this. One of the big selling points of Pathfinder is that it is [i]not[/i] 4e. Pulling in the 4e rules, in whole or in any significant part, would be a bad move. 2) If someone else builds a 3.75e using 3e and 4e mechanics, that's just more competition for Pathfinder - any competitor would be too small to seriously bother WotC. 3) If and when someone [i]does[/i] lift some part of the rules and develop them in an interesting manner, those advances would necessarily also be open - meaning that WotC could take any good innovation and roll it right back into D&D. 4) There's almost nothing in 4e that can't be done using the OGL anyway. Healing surges are pretty much just a re-codification of Reserve Points (which are in Unearthed Arcana, and so open content); Daily, Encounter and At-will powers all already exist, if not by name; Minions are just weaker monsters, and elites and solos more powerful ones; and so on. All formally opening the rules [i]actually[/i] does is remove even the risk of litigation from the equation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If WotC Released D&D 3.75 Tomorrow....
Top