Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Orius" data-source="post: 4826176" data-attributes="member: 8863">It would depend on the group and what they wanted to play.&nbsp; If I was DMing, I'd probably go 2e with some amount of house rules to cover up the rough spots, because that's mostly what I have.&nbsp; RC might be ok, if I had the book. I don't have any 1e books, so I wouldn't be running that, but I'd play with a competant DM.&nbsp; I'd probably say no to the original game, since there are a lot of holes in it.&nbsp; I wouldn't mind running a 2e campaign if the group absolutely insisted on pre-3e, but I'd probably use a base that's somewhere between core and Player's Option.&nbsp; The 2e core is okay, but it isn't perfect.&nbsp; If they wanted to go full PO, I'd likely end up restricting some of the stuff (hello broken subabilities!), but I wouldn't mind.&nbsp; I'd rather run 3e myself since it does a lot of the stuff a cleaned up late 2e game would do, but with a lot less prep work for me as DM.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Orius, post: 4826176, member: 8863"] It would depend on the group and what they wanted to play. If I was DMing, I'd probably go 2e with some amount of house rules to cover up the rough spots, because that's mostly what I have. RC might be ok, if I had the book. I don't have any 1e books, so I wouldn't be running that, but I'd play with a competant DM. I'd probably say no to the original game, since there are a lot of holes in it. I wouldn't mind running a 2e campaign if the group absolutely insisted on pre-3e, but I'd probably use a base that's somewhere between core and Player's Option. The 2e core is okay, but it isn't perfect. If they wanted to go full PO, I'd likely end up restricting some of the stuff (hello broken subabilities!), but I wouldn't mind. I'd rather run 3e myself since it does a lot of the stuff a cleaned up late 2e game would do, but with a lot less prep work for me as DM. [/QUOTE]

Verification