Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
If you don't like minions - how would you do it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grinnen Baeritt" data-source="post: 4397823" data-attributes="member: 71566"><p>Ok. First an apology, I haven't read ALL of what has been posted above so I may repeat some other posters sentiments regarding this subject.</p><p> </p><p>Although I like the general idea of minions as being basically 1 hit cannon fodder I do have some reservations.. and this I suppose is related to how things used to be (in all previous editions) and involves hp's of monsters in general.</p><p> </p><p>To me, and many other I expect the idea of minions (cannon fodder) is not exactly a new thing. However, it does seem as if the standard version of the creatures that WERE cannon fodder have now become anything but and that 4th ed has imlemented a huge rift between the toughness of a minion and standard-type monsters like the humaniods. </p><p> </p><p>The extra potiental for leader-types and solo monsters is good and matches the power increases that have occured in the characters. IMO this doesn't need changing.</p><p> </p><p>What I'm trying to say that rather than having a "Minion"/Standard forms of such creature at all, make ALL such creatures "Minions" but change the way that damage is recorded to them and change them to a differing definition perhaps a "Horde" creature.</p><p> </p><p>Instead of only having 1hp, each "horde" creature has a indeterminate number of hit points, these are checked only when the creature suffers damage. Only the dice type used is recorded in the scenario. </p><p> </p><p>If the damage caused to the creature exceeds that randomly determined amount in one blow that creature is dead, if it isn't then it simply continues fighting. NO DAMAGE IS RECORDED the player simply assumes that the creature is tougher than normal and has more hit points. (Much the same as the current rules for minions/standard creatures work) except there is no distinction between the two and no real way for the players to guess.</p><p> </p><p>So for hp, Kobold would have 1d4, Goblin a 1d6, Orc/Hobgoblin 1d8 etc </p><p> </p><p>These dice are rolled and compared to the damage caused to them when the creature is hit <strong>and</strong> the damage caused is less than the highest possible result of the hp dice.</p><p> </p><p>A Critical simply kills them regardless of damage caused.</p><p> </p><p>The current stat block is used with additions to damage etc for level increases as per normal, but for each additional level the creatures base hp dice total is only increased by 1.</p><p> </p><p>e.g. a Kobold with 4 level increases has 1d4+4.</p><p> </p><p>In most cases, there will not be a noticable difference between the standard minion. e.g. A 1st level fighter doing 1d8+4 WILL automatically kill a standard Kobold, thus the hp dice need not be rolled. Though a Cleric doing 1d6+1 has a roughly 50% chance of killing a Kobold even with minimum damage. </p><p> </p><p>Therefore the Player determines damage, if it less than the potiental maximum for the creature then the DM rolls for it's hit points.</p><p>If the player fails to exceed that, the creature survives and the next player to hit it follows the same procedure. The creatures hp are re-rolled. No damage is recorded between blows, it is either dead or effectively unharmed.</p><p> </p><p>The damage caused by misses WOULD cause damage in the same fashion. Thus a wizard doing 24 points of damage would still automatically kill any creatures having 12 or less hp caught in the area of effect.</p><p> </p><p>The net result is a system where the DM does not need as much book-keeping and the monsters become more of a variable threat.</p><p> </p><p>I quite like the idea that the creature becomes bloodied after a hit as mention in one of the posts above, in this case I'd suggest the creature becoming "bloodied" if it survives ANY hit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grinnen Baeritt, post: 4397823, member: 71566"] Ok. First an apology, I haven't read ALL of what has been posted above so I may repeat some other posters sentiments regarding this subject. Although I like the general idea of minions as being basically 1 hit cannon fodder I do have some reservations.. and this I suppose is related to how things used to be (in all previous editions) and involves hp's of monsters in general. To me, and many other I expect the idea of minions (cannon fodder) is not exactly a new thing. However, it does seem as if the standard version of the creatures that WERE cannon fodder have now become anything but and that 4th ed has imlemented a huge rift between the toughness of a minion and standard-type monsters like the humaniods. The extra potiental for leader-types and solo monsters is good and matches the power increases that have occured in the characters. IMO this doesn't need changing. What I'm trying to say that rather than having a "Minion"/Standard forms of such creature at all, make ALL such creatures "Minions" but change the way that damage is recorded to them and change them to a differing definition perhaps a "Horde" creature. Instead of only having 1hp, each "horde" creature has a indeterminate number of hit points, these are checked only when the creature suffers damage. Only the dice type used is recorded in the scenario. If the damage caused to the creature exceeds that randomly determined amount in one blow that creature is dead, if it isn't then it simply continues fighting. NO DAMAGE IS RECORDED the player simply assumes that the creature is tougher than normal and has more hit points. (Much the same as the current rules for minions/standard creatures work) except there is no distinction between the two and no real way for the players to guess. So for hp, Kobold would have 1d4, Goblin a 1d6, Orc/Hobgoblin 1d8 etc These dice are rolled and compared to the damage caused to them when the creature is hit [B]and[/B] the damage caused is less than the highest possible result of the hp dice. A Critical simply kills them regardless of damage caused. The current stat block is used with additions to damage etc for level increases as per normal, but for each additional level the creatures base hp dice total is only increased by 1. e.g. a Kobold with 4 level increases has 1d4+4. In most cases, there will not be a noticable difference between the standard minion. e.g. A 1st level fighter doing 1d8+4 WILL automatically kill a standard Kobold, thus the hp dice need not be rolled. Though a Cleric doing 1d6+1 has a roughly 50% chance of killing a Kobold even with minimum damage. Therefore the Player determines damage, if it less than the potiental maximum for the creature then the DM rolls for it's hit points. If the player fails to exceed that, the creature survives and the next player to hit it follows the same procedure. The creatures hp are re-rolled. No damage is recorded between blows, it is either dead or effectively unharmed. The damage caused by misses WOULD cause damage in the same fashion. Thus a wizard doing 24 points of damage would still automatically kill any creatures having 12 or less hp caught in the area of effect. The net result is a system where the DM does not need as much book-keeping and the monsters become more of a variable threat. I quite like the idea that the creature becomes bloodied after a hit as mention in one of the posts above, in this case I'd suggest the creature becoming "bloodied" if it survives ANY hit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
If you don't like minions - how would you do it?
Top