Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ravensblood" data-source="post: 3132327" data-attributes="member: 17707">I personally think if it comes from WoTC then it should at least be allowed until it proves to be a problem or hindrance.  What if the option C individual had a great time playing his specialized sorcerer from CA and it never became an issue in the game.  Especially if it's something that hasn't been played before in the group, and there are no experiences with that to base a decision on.  For example, I wanted to play a Mystic Theurge in our current campaign and the GM decided to veto that idea.  No one in our group had ever played one and the GM went on and ruled against it based on the popular opinion of his friend that it would be overpowered.  How are we ever going to know that it's overpowered if no one ever plays one.  And each individual can play their character a multitude of different ways.  Being worried that it'll become a problem later is pointless.  Any player playing any class or using any feat could do something unexpected to make things difficult for the GM.  It would be a totally different scenario if the GM had ran a few games where other people had played a MT and found that it was overpowered and usually outshone the other characters.  That ruling is fine with me because there has been some experience to mold the opinion.</blockquote>