Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mark CMG" data-source="post: 5539710" data-attributes="member: 10479"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" />  Didn't mean to sound too dissatisfied with the poll arangement.We broke out some 4E Gamma World this weekend after having played some 1E/2E GW a couple of weeks ago.  The old version was much more potentially lethal, I think, but the randomness of acquiring powers in the new version made things difficult to gauge.  The GM was disappointed that combat seemed to bog things down compared to the pace of the old version, whereas the GM didn't care much for the layout of the early edition for getting info in or out of combat (though the GM was also saying he felt the organization of the newer edition wasn't a great deal better).  We've been playing in a continuous scenario from the early to current editions but next time we keep it going we're going to try switching up the system to octane ( <a href="http://rpggeek.com/rpgitem/44054/octane" target="_blank">octaNe | RPG Item | RPGGeek</a> ) and see what that does for us.</blockquote>