NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 4138611" data-attributes="member: 1465">Oddly, I consider that part a plot hook. Using Mordenkainen's Disjunction is one way of SOME PC parties to complete a mission of destroying an artifact, but the price is... 95% chance of starting another adventure!I know that it can potentially remove ideas like "you can only destroy this artifact by travelling to Mordor", but I have no problems with SOME archwizards in the world being able to attempt doing it with the spell. Fact is, if the party knows how to cast the spell, I won't probably bother using an artifact as a mean to trigger the next adventure (the Mordor case). I will simply use another hook. One or the other hook doesn't really matter, they are all usually trite ideas anyway.By the way, I see this spell as a "last resort" that a wizard would never use repeatedly, but only when all other options have failed.And also I rarely play games that high level, which I reserve to an incredibly few PC/NPC in the world. Because of that, I do not even expect 9th level spells to be very balanced.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> That could actually been seen as a deterrent  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification