Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If you started playing D&D with the Basic D&D rules, which edition was it?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rogueattorney" data-source="post: 1634696" data-attributes="member: 17551"><p>Just to follow up on some of what Merric said. There are some rules differences between the Moldvay and Mentzer Basic sets. We delve into them with glee on Dragonfoot's Classic D&D board. However, these rule differences are so few and far in between, and often times quite subtle, that most won't really notice unless they are paying rapt attention, and even then these rarely effect game play.</p><p></p><p>The big rule differences come between the Cook (1981 Otus cover) and Mentzer (1983 Elmore cover) Expert boxes. Each of the human classes was toned down in terms of spells received, saving throws, and other abilities. This is due to the fact that with the 1981 set, 14th level was about the end of the road for the characters, while the 1983 set intended for the characters to be able to go up to 36th level.</p><p></p><p>The Rules Cyclopedia is a compilation of the 4 Mentzer boxes (Basic, Expert, Companion, and Master with the Immortals box being updated in the Wrath of the Immortals box set) plus some additional rules that were added in the Gazetteer series. Overall, the RC is a very nice sourcebook. However, there are some pretty bad errors, especially in the combat section, which sometimes borders on incomprehensibility. There are two unofficial erratas on the Internet: <a href="http://www.dnd.starflung.com/rcerrata.html" target="_blank">http://www.dnd.starflung.com/rcerrata.html</a> and <a href="http://www.flxtek.net/~aaron/RCerrata/" target="_blank">http://www.flxtek.net/~aaron/RCerrata/</a></p><p></p><p>The 1991 Black box and the 1994 and 1996 boxes had almost identical content, with some different art and different box sizes. They are very nice rulebooks, with painstaking, step-by-step "how to's" for the youngest players. However, there are some horrible rule problems, the most infamous being the "5' rule".</p><p></p><p>R.A.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rogueattorney, post: 1634696, member: 17551"] Just to follow up on some of what Merric said. There are some rules differences between the Moldvay and Mentzer Basic sets. We delve into them with glee on Dragonfoot's Classic D&D board. However, these rule differences are so few and far in between, and often times quite subtle, that most won't really notice unless they are paying rapt attention, and even then these rarely effect game play. The big rule differences come between the Cook (1981 Otus cover) and Mentzer (1983 Elmore cover) Expert boxes. Each of the human classes was toned down in terms of spells received, saving throws, and other abilities. This is due to the fact that with the 1981 set, 14th level was about the end of the road for the characters, while the 1983 set intended for the characters to be able to go up to 36th level. The Rules Cyclopedia is a compilation of the 4 Mentzer boxes (Basic, Expert, Companion, and Master with the Immortals box being updated in the Wrath of the Immortals box set) plus some additional rules that were added in the Gazetteer series. Overall, the RC is a very nice sourcebook. However, there are some pretty bad errors, especially in the combat section, which sometimes borders on incomprehensibility. There are two unofficial erratas on the Internet: [url]http://www.dnd.starflung.com/rcerrata.html[/url] and [url]http://www.flxtek.net/~aaron/RCerrata/[/url] The 1991 Black box and the 1994 and 1996 boxes had almost identical content, with some different art and different box sizes. They are very nice rulebooks, with painstaking, step-by-step "how to's" for the youngest players. However, there are some horrible rule problems, the most infamous being the "5' rule". R.A. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
If you started playing D&D with the Basic D&D rules, which edition was it?
Top